When does conservation of momentum apply?
The total momentum of a fixed collection of classical bodies has the same value before and after a process when external impulse over that interval vanishes. Measure all velocities in the same inertial frame. A single component is conserved when external impulse in that direction is zero.[1]
First consider both trolleys together and imagine a boundary around them. Their mutual contact forces are internal. Track friction or a push from outside is external. If you instead select only one trolley, contact from the other trolley is external too. “Internal” and “external” describe the selected balance rather than different kinds of force.[1]
A fixed selection of matter is closed when no mass crosses its boundary. This alone does not ensure momentum conservation: the environment can still impart impulse. If external impulse vanishes over an interval, initial and final momenta match. If net external force is zero at every instant, total momentum remains constant throughout the process.[1]
All velocities use the same inertial frame. Zero external impulse gives P⃗after = P⃗before.[1]
A cart pair on a horizontal track may approximately conserve horizontal momentum despite gravity and support forces. What matters is their horizontal component and horizontal friction impulse. Components can be balanced separately. A brief collision does not automatically justify ignoring every external force; explain why its integral is small.[1]
Why internal forces disappear from the balance
The trolleys may accelerate each other strongly during a collision. Newton’s third law still gives equal and opposite contact forces at each instant: . This does not make force on either trolley zero. It means the internal contributions cancel pairwise when the two equations of motion are added. For each individual trolley, Newton’s second law relates net force to the rate of change of its momentum; the internal terms cancel only after the two balances are added.[6][8]
For more bodies, sum all momenta and external forces in the same way.[6]
Integration gives the change across the collision; is the conservation condition.[6]
For two bodies in one dimension this becomes . A prime denotes the post-collision state, not a derivative. If both final velocities are unknown, this is just one equation. Add a suitable condition, such as sticking together or, for an elastic collision, conservation of kinetic energy.[2]
Elastic, inelastic or perfectly inelastic?
This rearrangement requires both bodies to move together afterwards and negligible external impulse.
Choose a positive axis direction and assign negative velocities to motion in the opposite direction. Masses are positive. After sticking, common velocity lies between initial velocities because it is a mass-weighted average. A result outside that range signals a sign or arithmetic error in this model.
An elastic collision also preserves total kinetic energy. An inelastic collision changes it, with some energy becoming internal energy, deformation or sound. Perfectly inelastic means sticking together. Total energy of a sufficiently inclusive isolated system remains conserved even when its kinetic energy decreases.[2]
Why is one momentum equation insufficient for every collision?
If both final velocities are unknown, the one-dimensional momentum balance allows many possible outcomes. Sticking adds equal final velocities as a condition. An elastic collision instead adds conservation of kinetic energy. The collision type must be specified or justified by a model; it does not follow simply from the word “collision”.[2]
For a concrete comparison, a 1 kg trolley at +4 m/s approaches a stationary 1 kg trolley. Sticking gives both a final velocity of +2 m/s. In an ideal elastic one-dimensional collision, the first trolley stops and the second moves at +4 m/s. Both outcomes conserve the same total momentum; only the second also conserves kinetic energy.[2]
The same initial data give different collision outcomes when the additional model condition changes.[2]
How do you calculate common velocity and impulse?
Sticking with opposite initial directions
- Given
- m1 = 2 kg, v1 = +3 m/s; m2 = 1 kg, v2 = −1 m/s. They stick together; external horizontal impulse is negligible.
- Find
- Find their common velocity and the change in kinetic energy.
Approach: With negligible external horizontal impulse use , and calculate kinetic energies separately. Add signed initial momenta.
Divide this momentum by combined mass.
Add both initial kinetic energies.
Find final kinetic energy and the difference.
Result: Both move at +1.667 m/s. Kinetic energy decreases by 5.333 J.
Check: . This confirms total momentum. Final velocity lies between −1 and +3 m/s. The kinetic-energy decrease is conversion, not disappearance of total energy.
Equal opposite impulses, unequal velocity changes
- Given
- m1 = 4 kg, v1 = +2 m/s; m2 = 2 kg, v2 = −1 m/s. They stick; external horizontal forces are negligible. Contact time is 0.050 s.
- Find
- Calculate final velocity, both impulses and mean contact forces.
Approach: First use ; then each cart has and . Conserve total momentum and divide by total mass.
Use each body’s mass to find its momentum change.
Calculate mean contact forces from .
Result: Final velocity is +1 m/s. Contact impulses are −4 and +4 N·s; mean forces are −80 and +80 N.
Check: ; total momentum is 6 kg·m/s both before and after. Yet and differ because the masses differ.
How do you balance momentum in multiple directions?
Each conserved component requires zero external impulse in that particular direction.[3]
The collision diagram shows an elastic special case: , v2 = 0, and . The unequal arrows represent velocities, not forces. Substitution confirms equal total momentum and kinetic energy before and after. Sticking carts would instead have equal final velocities.
For two equal masses initially moving at (2, 0) and (0, 2) m/s, sticking gives . Speed is √2 m/s, not 2 m/s. Solve components before finding magnitude. With no net external force, the centre of mass continues at constant velocity even while individual parts accelerate strongly.[3]
How do you explain recoil for fixed masses and rockets?
If two initially stationary bodies push apart, . A 6 kg body moving at +2 m/s requires a 12 kg partner to move at −1 m/s when external impulse is zero. New kinetic energy may come from a released spring or stored internal energy; momentum conservation does not specify its source.
A rocket together with its expelled gas can form a closed system. The rocket alone is open: gas carries momentum across its boundary. A two-fixed-mass equation cannot simply be reused with time-dependent rocket mass. Gravity and drag also contribute external forces.[4]
When is an external impulse small enough?
External friction is often neglected during a short collision. Justify this with an estimate: multiply a known bound on external force by collision duration. Compare that possible external impulse with the momentum changes you want to resolve. When large initial momenta almost cancel, even a small external contribution can matter for the remaining total momentum.[1]
Estimate the accuracy of a trolley balance
- Given
- Two sticking trolleys have combined mass 4.0 kg and initial momentum +6.0 kg·m/s. Collision duration is 0.020 s; total external horizontal force magnitude is at most 2.0 N.
- Find
- Estimate how far final velocity can differ from the result neglecting external impulse.
Approach: bound external impulse first, then divide by combined mass.
Calculate the idealised value and maximum deviation.
Result: Actual final velocity lies between +1.49 and +1.51 m/s.
Check: Maximum possible momentum change 0.040 N·s is about 0.67% of initial momentum. External-force direction is unknown, so an interval is stated.
What conservation alone cannot determine
Momentum conservation alone does not determine collision duration, peak force, deformation or both final velocities. A vehicle alone does not conserve momentum when hitting an anchored obstacle. For a system containing vehicle, obstacle and Earth, their contact forces may be internal; the chosen boundary decides.
The derivation here uses classical bodies and pairwise internal forces. In electromagnetic systems, fields can also carry momentum, so particle momenta alone may be insufficient. Total momentum remains a key relativistic balance, but must be replaced by the appropriate relativistic expression.[5][7]
Five problems with solutions
Calculate · Foundation
A 1.5 kg cart moving at +4 m/s hits a stationary 2.5 kg cart. They stick with zero external horizontal impulse. Find v′.
Show hint
Divide initial momentum by combined mass.
Learning goal: Find common velocity after a sticking collision.
Show solution and calculation
.
Hence .
Calculate · Application
Two 0.5 kg bodies move at +2 and −2 m/s and stick. Find v′ and the converted kinetic energy.
Show hint
Add momentum and energy separately.
Learning goal: Check momentum balance and converted kinetic energy separately.
Show solution and calculation
, so .
Initial energy is ; final kinetic energy is zero.
Thus 2 J of kinetic energy is converted.
Transfer · Application
A system initially has Px = 6 kg·m/s. A constant external force Fx = −5 N acts for 0.20 s. Find final momentum.
Show hint
Use the external-impulse balance rather than .
Learning goal: Update total momentum using a specified external impulse.
Show solution and calculation
; .
Total momentum is not conserved over this interval.
Interpret · Application
On an ideal horizontal track, a compressed spring pushes apart two initially stationary carts of masses 1 kg and 3 kg. Afterwards the light cart moves at +6 m/s. The spring is massless and external horizontal forces vanish. Find the heavy cart’s velocity. Why is momentum not conserved for the light cart alone, but conserved for the system of both carts and spring?
Show hint
Spring force is external to an individual cart but internal to the combined system. Balance the initially zero total momentum.
Learning goal: Choose the system boundary for a momentum balance.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: choose both carts plus the massless spring as the system and form the horizontal momentum balance.
The heavy cart acquires −2 m/s.
The light cart alone receives a spring impulse, reaching +6 kg·m/s.
Check: the heavy cart has −6 kg·m/s. Stored spring energy enables the motion; momentum conservation alone does not determine that energy.
Error analysis · Application
A 2 kg cart moving at +3 m/s hits a stationary 2 kg cart; they stick. External impulse is negligible. A solution uses kinetic-energy conservation to obtain common velocity . Correct the approach and use total momentum and kinetic-energy loss to show why that result is impossible.
Show hint
In a perfectly inelastic collision, total momentum is conserved, not kinetic energy. Check the proposed final momentum.
Learning goal: Recognize invalid kinetic-energy conservation in a sticking collision.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: determine common velocity from conserved total momentum.
It is +1.5 m/s.
Kinetic energy decreases from 9 J to 4.5 J; 4.5 J transfers into other energy forms.
Check: the incorrect proposal gives about 8.49 kg·m/s instead of the initial 6 kg·m/s, requiring an external impulse that the model excludes.
What to take away
Choose the system boundary first and account for external impulse. Add signed, directed momenta in the same frame. Sticking and elastic rebound impose different additional conditions. Conservation of momentum determines neither collision duration nor peak force and does not replace a complete energy balance.
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 1, 2026
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §9.3: Conservation of Linear Momentum
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §9.4: Types of Collisions
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §9.6: Center of Mass
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §9.7: Rocket Propulsion
- OpenStax, University Physics 3 §5.8: Relativistic Momentum
- MIT OpenCourseWare, Classical Mechanics: 16.1 Conservation of Momentum
- OpenStax, University Physics 2 §16.4: Momentum and Radiation Pressure
- OpenStax University Physics1 §5.3: Newton’s Second Law
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Clarified validity conditions directly; exposed existing collision, recoil and component answers and linked momentum, Newton’s law and energy in context.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Revised the introduction and learning progression; added explanatory intermediate steps, an application example and a summary. Retained existing examples and all five exercises.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Conservation of Momentum. Updated October 1, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/impulserhaltung
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.