Which orbit size determines the period?
A more distant companion takes longer to orbit within the same gravitational system. For an ellipse, the relevant fixed geometric quantity is its semimajor axis: half the longest ellipse axis. Instantaneous separation instead changes along the orbit. Begin with the circle, then explore why the same rule extends to ellipses.[1]
- Prior knowledge: radius, squared and cubed quantities, and period. A relative orbit describes one partner’s position relative to the other.
What is Kepler’s third law, and which mass counts?
a is the semimajor axis of the relative separation-vector orbit; is the gravitational parameter in .[3]
Consider two point masses M and m interacting only through their mutual Newtonian attraction. Both orbit their common centre of mass. Their individual semimajor axes and am sum to relative semimajor axis a. Both have the same period. The usual denominator neglects m compared with M.[3]
For comparable masses, distinguish the relative orbit from the two barycentric orbits.[3]
If is small, is approximately . Two light companions of the same source then share this ratio. It is not universally equal across different central bodies or non-negligible companion masses.[5]
View diagram: Fourfold semimajor axis means eightfold period
Fourfold semimajor axis means eightfold period
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
What is the semi-major axis of an ellipse?
rp and ra are minimum and maximum relative separations; 0 ≤ e < 1 describes a bound ellipse.[1]
The major axis passes through both foci and has length 2a. Its semimajor axis runs from the ellipse centre to the edge. The gravitational reference point is at a focus, not the ellipse centre. In the circular limit these points coincide and a is constant orbital radius.[1]
a is not mean altitude above a planet’s surface. Given closest and farthest altitudes, first add planet radius to each, then average the resulting separations. Time-averaged separation along an ellipse is generally not equal to a either. The third law uses the geometric semimajor axis.
How does Newton’s law give the circular-orbit relation?
Newton’s law of gravitation supplies mutual attraction in the two-body model used here. Let point from M to m. Subtracting their accelerations gives . A relative circular orbit has radial acceleration . Here is their relative speed, not automatically either body’s speed about the centre of mass.[3]
Substitution gives the third law for . This calculation alone does not prove the elliptical case.[2]
Explore further: Why ellipses follow the same rule
For the Newtonian relative orbit, specific angular-momentum magnitude is constant, in . Central acceleration produces no torque, so swept area per time is . Over one period the swept area is , where .[1][4]
In polar coordinates, . Set and differentiate with respect to angle instead of time. The radial motion equation becomes , where primes denote angle derivatives. Its solution is when points toward closest approach.[3]
Eccentricity cancels: bound ellipses with the same a and have the same period.
This derivation assumes Newtonian attraction and an unperturbed two-body orbit. It establishes a consequence within the model rather than the experimental origin of the gravitational law. For there is no bound complete orbital period of this kind.
Calculating period, semi-major axis and total mass
T, a and must be positive; G is positive. The mass rearrangement initially gives total mass.
With a in metres and in , has units of seconds squared. Convert kilometres to metres before cubing; a factor of 1000 in a gives a factor of one billion in . Convert days to seconds by multiplying by 86400.
Writing without a constant uses a special normalisation, not a general SI equation. For two orbits with the same , periods and semimajor axes may each use matching arbitrary units: . Different adds the factor .
Calculating an ellipse and two comparable-mass partners
An elliptical orbit has varying speed during a revolution. Speed on a circular orbit is a special case with the appropriate constant radius; for comparable masses, relative motion must still be distinguished from motion about the centre of mass.[1][2]
Period of a specified ellipse
- Given
- Relative two-body model with ; closest separation 7200 km, farthest separation 10800 km.
- Find
- Find semimajor axis and period.
Approach: For the relative ellipse use and . Average centre separations and convert to metres.
Cube semimajor axis and divide by .
Use the positive root and factor 2π.
Result: a is 9000 km; model period is approximately 8482 s or 141.4 minutes.
Check: . A circle with the same a and has the same period; inserting 7200 km alone describes a different orbit.
Two companions of comparable mass
- Given
- , ; relative semimajor axis ; . Unperturbed model.
- Find
- Calculate period and both barycentric semimajor axes.
Approach: Both masses contribute to ; the relative semimajor axis determines . Use total mass to find .
Calculate period from the relative orbit.
Partition the semimajor axis inversely to mass.
Result: Both have a period of approximately 398.1 days. Their barycentric semimajor axes sum to 2.00×1011 m.
Check: checks the centre of mass. Neglecting m in the denominator would overestimate period by .
What does a period measurement determine, and when is an orbit geostationary?
T and relative semimajor axis first determine , and G then gives . Separating masses requires additional information, such as the ratio of barycentric orbits. For a very light satellite, total mass is effectively planet mass. Measurement uncertainty in a and T determines accuracy. The vis-viva equation for elliptical orbits adds instantaneous separation to determine local relative-orbit speed; period alone is insufficient.[1][2]
A geostationary orbit needs more than the correct period: it must be circular, equatorial and rotate in the same direction as Earth. The same period on an inclined or elliptical orbit gives geosynchronous motion, not a fixed sky position. To obtain altitude, subtract the selected planet radius from circular orbital radius.[2][6]
Other bodies, oblateness, drag, thrust manoeuvres and relativistic effects may change a real orbit. The two-body formula then approximates the motion or describes instantaneous orbital elements. A positive calculated T does not establish collision avoidance or stability under these perturbations.[3]
Five problems with solutions
Calculate · Foundation
Two light companions of the same source have a2 = 4a1. Find .
Show hint
Raise the semimajor-axis ratio to the power .
Learning goal: Calculate period scaling from a semimajor-axis ratio.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: At fixed , compare relative semimajor axes through .
.
Calculate · Application
A relative ellipse has closest separation 3.00×107 m and farthest separation 5.00×107 m. For , find a and T.
Show hint
First find a as half the sum.
Learning goal: Find ellipse semimajor axis from extreme separations and calculate period.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: First find , then use .
.
, approximately 13.96 hours.
Transfer · Application
and T = 10.0 days. Use to find total mass.
Show hint
Convert days to seconds and use the mass rearrangement.
Learning goal: Infer total mass from orbit size and period converted to seconds.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Convert days to seconds and use .
With , this gives .
The measurement determines the sum rather than individual masses.
Check: substituting total mass into gives ten days again.
Interpret · Application
Two negligibly light satellites orbit the same point mass in the Newtonian model. Orbit A is circular with radius 12 000 km; orbit B is elliptical with closest distance 6000 km and greatest distance 18 000 km. Compare their periods. Does equal period also mean both have the same speed throughout their orbits?
Show hint
For an ellipse, semimajor axis is the mean of closest and greatest distances. The third law gives period, not the local speed profile.
Learning goal: Recognize equal semimajor axes as the period criterion despite different orbit shapes.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: establish each semimajor axis and apply Kepler’s third law as a ratio.
Both have semimajor axis 12 000 km and therefore equal periods.
Distance and speed vary along the ellipse; equal period does not mean equal local speed.
Check: eccentricity is 0.50 for the ellipse and zero for the circle, but agrees.
Error analysis · Challenge
Two equal-mass stars follow circular orbits around their common centre of mass. Each orbital radius is and both have the same period T. A calculation uses in . Which semimajor axis belongs in this equation, and by what factor does the wrong a underestimate total mass?
Show hint
The equation describes the relative orbit: separation of one star from the other. Equal masses lie on opposite sides of the centre of mass.
Learning goal: Separate the relative two-body orbit from barycentric orbits when inferring mass.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: add the two barycentric radii to obtain the relative circular orbit.
The required semimajor axis is 4.0·109 m.
For fixed T, inferred total mass is proportional to its cube.
Using b therefore gives only one eighth of the correct mass.
Check: doubling a multiplies by eight while the measured period remains unchanged.
What to remember
Use the relative orbit’s semimajor axis and both partners’ total mass. A circle is the simple special case; an ellipse with the same semimajor axis has the same period at fixed gravitational parameter. Axis and time units must match the constant used. Matching period alone does not make a satellite geostationary.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 1, 2026
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §13.5: Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion
- OpenStax, University Physics 1 §13.4: Satellite Orbits and Energy
- MIT OpenCourseWare, Dynamics L15: Central Force Motion and Kepler’s Laws
- MIT OpenCourseWare, Introduction to Astronomy: Kepler Problem
- NASA Science: Orbits and Kepler’s Laws
- ESA: Orbits — geostationary geometry and altitude
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 2 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Made period, relative semi-major axis, total mass, circular/elliptical derivations and geostationary conditions accessible through learning questions; retained comparable-mass calculations and linked gravitation, circular-orbit speed and vis-viva in context.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Added an individual introduction and conclusion, checked existing calculations, clarified notation and model references, and added an original learning figure.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Kepler Third Law. Updated October 1, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/kepler-drittes-gesetz
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.