Why inductor current does not respond instantly
A source is switched on, but inductor current does not instantly reach its final value. The growing current builds a magnetic field whose change produces an emf opposing that growth. After switch-off, the same stored energy can keep current flowing. The component responds to current change, not merely current magnitude.[1][4]
Before calculating a sign, establish whether you mean the driving self-emf or the passive voltage drop across the ideal component. A real winding also has a resistive term. Our initial calculations use fixed geometry and constant linear L.[1][4]
Self-flux links every turn
λ is flux linkage in webers. Generally sum the oriented fluxes of all turns; λ=NΦ applies only when each turn links the same flux. Fixed geometry and a linear material response additionally give λ=LI.[1]
In the linear model, flux linkage produced by the same current increases in proportion to current. L combines geometry and suitable material response. Turn normals are chosen consistently with positive current direction, giving positive self-inductance. This does not claim that an arbitrary iron core has the same constant value at every current. Moving the winding can also change linkage.[1]
Distinguish induced emf and passive terminal voltage
Emf is positive in the chosen loop direction. uL is the passive voltage drop: positive current enters the positive voltage terminal. L is constant here.[1][2]
The emf minus sign describes Lenz’s opposition. It does not forbid a different correctly defined voltage reference from using a plus sign. Increasing positive current gives negative emf but positive passive terminal voltage, and the ideal component absorbs energy. Decreasing that current reverses both voltage signs. A real winding also has a resistive drop; total terminal voltage is not automatically only the inductive contribution.[1][4]
From Faraday to current-change rate
In the linear model L is initially the proportionality factor between current and self-flux linkage. Faraday’s law of induction acts on the time derivative of that linkage. Only the additional assumption of constant L allows it outside the derivative. This separates the field law from the component assumption.[1][2]
Faraday’s law gives emf. The final rearrangement retains voltage reference; magnitudes alone cannot give a signed rate.[2][1]
The difference between final and initial current divided by interval length is an average rate. It replaces instantaneous derivative only for a linear ramp. At fixed L the resulting emf is otherwise the interval average, not necessarily the peak value. Area under the emf-time curve instead determines current change whether the curve is constant or curved.[1]
Assume the same sign convention and constant L.[1]
Explore further: inductance from coil geometry
Long tightly wound air-core solenoid; A is interior cross-sectional area and Φ approximates equal flux through each turn.[1]
More turns strengthen interior field at equal current, while the same flux links more turns: this produces quadratic dependence. This assumes unchanged length, area and material model. If winding also alters geometry, the simple factor-of-four rule needs further checking. A toroidal coil or a magnetic circuit with a gap needs its appropriate geometry expression.[1]
Voltage sign alone does not determine energy flow
Passive reference and lossless linear component. Positive power means energy absorption.[3]
Energy depends on current squared, not current sign. Even positive passive voltage can release energy if negative current decreases in magnitude: the deciding quantity is current times voltage. Henry equals volt-seconds per ampere; multiplying by amperes per second gives volts. Henry times amperes squared gives joules. A steady nonzero field can store energy while induced emf is zero at constant current.[3]
The Thomson LC oscillation relation leads to the ideal LC circuit, where an inductor and capacitor exchange energy. The inductor energy calculated here is only one contribution to that combined balance.[3][7]
Account fully for a ramp and switch-off energy
Current falls with explicit signs
- Given
- Constant ; positive current falls linearly from 1.80 A to 0.300 A in 12.0 ms. Passive voltage and emf use the references defined above.
- Find
- Find both voltages and change in stored energy.
Approach: the explicitly linear ramp makes the average rate equal to the constant instantaneous rate. Evaluate voltage signs and squared currents separately.
Convert milliseconds to seconds.
Result: Emf +30.0 V, passive voltage −30.0 V; stored energy falls by 0.378 J.
Check: Average current is 1.05 A; constant passive voltage times average current times 12.0 ms gives −0.378 J. Positive emf sustains positive current while it decays.
Energy of a long air-core solenoid
- Given
- , , ; air-core model with . Current rises uniformly from 0 to 2.50 A over 20.0 ms.
- Find
- Calculate inductance, passive inductive voltage and final stored energy.
Approach: long-solenoid geometry gives L; the linear ramp gives voltage rate. Final energy must agree with supplied inductive work.
Convert area using the square of the length conversion.
Result: L≈0.452 mH, uL≈56.5 mV and Wf≈1.41 mJ.
Check: uL times average current 1.25 A times 20.0 ms gives the same energy. Copper loss would be an additional contribution, not part of this ideal inductive term.
Example: switch on a voltage
Resistance sets final current; L sets its rise
- Given
- At , a constant source is connected to ideal in series with total resistance . Initial current is zero; use passive inductor voltage and no other storage.
- Find
- Find current, inductor voltage and energy after one time constant.
Approach: source voltage divides between resistance and inductance. The differential equation determines the waveform.
Substitution at one time constant: current has not reached its final value; inductor voltage is not yet zero.
Result: After 20.0 ms: about 0.3793 A, +2.207 V passive inductor voltage and 14.38 mJ stored energy. Eventually they approach 0.600 A and 36.0 mJ.
Check: Resistor voltage adds to the inductor voltage to give 6.00 V. Positive current and positive passive voltage still indicate energy absorption; .
View diagram: switch-on response
Current rises while inductor voltage falls
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Five exercises with distinct voltage references
Calculate · Foundation
An ideal 80.0 mH inductor undergoes a linear current rise from 0.400 to 1.60 A in 6.00 ms. Find passive voltage and emf.
Show hint
First form the signed change rate.
Learning goal: Calculate terminal voltage and emf during a ramp.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: rate is +200 A/s.
Passive voltage +16.0 V; emf −16.0 V.
Check: positive current means absorption because passive voltage and current have the same sign.
Rearrange · Application
Current through constant linear L falls from 2.00 to 0.500 A. Measured emf-time integral is +0.0900 V·s in the chosen loop direction. Find L without assuming constant voltage.
Show hint
Integrate Faraday’s relation rather than using a peak value.
Learning goal: Determine L from an emf-time integral.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: the integral is .
With , .
Check: positive integral and negative current change give positive L; detailed waveform is unnecessary.
Interpret · Application
An ideal has I(t): linear 0→1 A from 0 to 2 ms, constant 1 A from 2 to 5 ms, linear 1→0.500 A from 5 to 6 ms. Find passive voltage in the three open intervals.
Show hint
At corners use one-sided values; derivative is not uniquely defined there.
Learning goal: Read voltage from curve slope rather than current height.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: multiply each slope by L.
Voltages are +50 V, 0 V, −50 V.
Check: the middle interval stores 0.050 J despite zero voltage; constant height does not mean loss of field.
Error analysis · Application
A real winding has and . At steady 1.50 A a voltmeter reads 9.0 V. A solution infers current growth 45 A/s. Identify and correct the error.
Show hint
Total terminal voltage has two contributions.
Learning goal: Distinguish emf from resistive voltage drop.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: split terminal voltage into and .
All 9.0 V is resistive drop, leaving zero inductive term and hence zero current rate.
Check: loss power is 13.5 W, not growing magnetic energy.
Transfer · Challenge
An ideal 0.120 H inductor initially carries 2.00 A. It is disconnected from the source but remains in a closed loop with 8.00 Ω total resistance. No capacitor or other loss path. Find time constant, initial passive inductor voltage and final heat.
Show hint
The loop is not open; resistance provides a determined current waveform.
Learning goal: Track switch-off energy through a closed resistive path.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: loop balance is .
Time constant 15.0 ms; initial inductor voltage −16.0 V.
Initial energy 0.240 J becomes heat.
Check: integrating over exponential decay gives the same energy; no arbitrary switch-off time is imposed.
Voltage spikes require a complete switch-off path
An ideal L cannot change current discontinuously at finite voltage. Opening a real switch sends field energy through other paths: parasitic capacitance, an arc, protection circuitry or coupled components. Actual peak voltage follows from the entire system, not L and initial current alone. A specified turn-off interval permits an average voltage but says nothing certain about peak voltage without waveform information.[4]
Changing linear geometry adds when differentiating LI. For a nonlinear fixed core, use the actual flux-current relation and its local slope. Hysteresis can make that relation history-dependent. The linear energy expression and a single L then need explicit validation. At high frequencies, winding capacitance and spatial field distribution may limit a lumped-component model.[1][6]
The second line requires fixed geometry and a single-valued flux-current relation; it does not apply to an arbitrary hysteretic or moving coil.[1]
In brief
Constant linear L connects self-flux linkage and current. Self-emf uses the opposition sign; passive voltage uses the voltage-drop reference. Current height sets energy; slope sets inductive voltage. Real switch-off requires the complete current and energy path.
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §14.2 Self-Inductance and Inductors
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §13.1 Faraday’s Law
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §14.3 Energy in a Magnetic Field
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §14.4 RL Circuits
- NIST: 2022 CODATA complete constants listing
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §12.7: Magnetism in Matter
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 2 §14.5 Oscillations in an LC Circuit
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Linked Faraday’s induction law and LC energy exchange in the relevant sections; preserved voltage references, exercises and switch-on diagram.
- Separated flux linkage, emf and passive voltage; developed linear energy, two original examples, five exercises and real switch-off limits.
- Expanded the learning sequence and model reasoning, added a third worked example and an original quantitative diagram, and refined mathematical typography and the concluding summary.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Self-Induction of a Coil. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/selbstinduktion-spule
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.