What changes rotational motion?
A heavy door is easier to turn by its outer handle than close to the hinge. Force alone therefore does not determine its turning effect: the lever arm matters too. That turning effect is torque. For a rotor, compare the sum of external torques with its inertia about the chosen axis. This explains why the same motor accelerates different rotors at different rates.[1]
- Prior knowledge: force balance and angular velocity. Moment of inertia describes how mass is distributed about an axis, rather than mass alone.
Net axial torque produces acceleration
For a rigid body about a fixed inertial axis, net external axial torque equals constant axial moment of inertia times signed angular acceleration.[1][2]
The left side sums all external contributions: drive, load, bearing friction and, where relevant, forces at supports or guides. Internal forces of the complete chosen body do not add external net torque. Positive motor torque may be fully balanced by negative load torque. Then although both torques are nonzero; the body may rotate uniformly.[3]
View diagram: Net torque sets the slope
Net torque sets the slope
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
From angular momentum to acceleration
Each particle shares angular velocity; its perpendicular distance to the fixed axis determines its axial angular momentum contribution.[2]
Rigidity and an unchanged body-fixed rotation axis keep all axial distances constant. Thus is time independent and differentiating gives . This derivation also explains why the formula concerns the axial component. The full angular momentum vector need not be parallel to angular velocity about an arbitrary axis. The more general vector balance sets external torque equal to the time derivative of angular momentum.[2]
The first division requires >0. The second requires ≠0 and a valid model; zero torque and zero acceleration do not determine I.
Angular momentum of a rigid body explains why this equation is one axial component of a more general balance. With unchanged inertia, differentiating signed angular velocity is sufficient here; a changing distribution or free spatial rotation requires checking the full balance.[2][1]
Explore further: Distinguish axial balance from a vector law
The scalar z balance for a constrained fixed axis needs no principal-axis condition. Bearings can supply transverse torques to maintain that direction. The additional statement that the full vector is with a single scalar I needs a suitable principal axis. A moment-of-inertia tensor describes the general vector relation.[2]
For a rolling body the contact location moves. It therefore is not automatically a permanently fixed inertial rotation axis. For planar rolling, a reliable balance combines centre-of-mass translation with rotation about the centre of mass . The rolling condition then links a and . Energy can alternatively be expressed using the instantaneous contact axis without automatically justifying every torque balance about that moving location.[5][3]
Specify lever arm, direction and units
r points from the chosen axis to the point of application. The right-hand rule sets the sign, not force magnitude alone.[1]
A tangential force at radius R produces magnitude . A radial force has no lever arm or torque about that axis. and joule have the same SI dimension, but torque is not energy. Work requires torque acting through angular displacement. Angular acceleration in retains angular meaning even though radian is dimensionless in SI.[1]
Drive and coupled descending mass
Motor with opposing load
- Given
- A rigid rotor about a fixed axis has . Motor torque is +2.40 and load torque −0.480 . Initially ; both torques stay constant for 1.50 s.
- Find
- Find , final angular velocity and energy change.
Approach: Add all external axial torques with their signs. . First sum signed torques.
With constant I and torque, is constant.
Calculate rotational energy change from initial and final values.
Result: The results are , and . The load opposes positive rotation throughout the interval.
Check: Independently, net work is . Motor work of 30.60 J and negative load work of −6.12 J give the same sum.
Descending mass drives a drum
- Given
- A mass hangs from a massless taut cord. The cord unwinds without slipping from a drum with and . Fixed frictionless axis, constant R, release from rest, drop , .
- Find
- Find a, cord tension and speed after the descent.
Approach: Combine translation of the mass, drum rotation and rope coupling. . Choose downward translation and unwinding rotation positive.
Eliminate cord tension and include rotational inertia.
Tension is below mg because the mass accelerates.
Use the descent distance with constant acceleration.
Result: , T≈13.202 N and . The drum receives part of the released gravitational energy.
Check: Independent energy check using unrounded values: , and . Their sum recovers 11.4777 J. The incorrect assumption would give , contradicting the coupled dynamics.
Torque and power complement the time balance
For the same fixed axis and constant I, torque work equals change in rotational kinetic energy.[3]
Instantaneous torque can be used in even when it varies with time. Only constant net torque with constant I justifies linear (t). Under constant mechanical P with , torque instead is , so acceleration depends on rotational state. Do not divide by at rest. An actual drive needs a startup characteristic instead of an infinite torque demand.[1][3]
Mechanical power describes work per time. For the same fixed axis, instantaneous ; constant torque therefore does not mean constant power when angular velocity changes. The sign shows whether a torque is instantaneously adding energy to the body or removing it.[1]
Check five axial balances
Calculate · Foundation
A rotor has and . Constant braking torque −0.900 acts until the first stop. Find and duration.
Show hint
Calculate only until rest; do not extend the braking model into reversal without justification.
Learning goal: Calculate braking angular acceleration and time to first stop.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Use ; at the first stop, .
This gives and .
Check: confirms rest. Subsequent motion depends on whether the brake holds or a drive continues acting.
Rearrange · Application
A rigid rotor on fixed bearings accelerates at +3.00 . Motor torque +1.60 and load torque −0.400 are the only axial contributions. Find I.
Show hint
Sum torques first, then divide by .
Learning goal: Find inertia from resultant torque and angular acceleration.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Add signed torques and rearrange .
Net torque is , giving .
Check: . Using motor torque alone would overestimate inertia.
Transfer · Challenge
A nonrigid rotor changes only radial mass distances; all masses share with no additional relative angular motion. At this instant , and =0. Find .
Show hint
Differentiate =Iωz using the product rule.
Learning goal: Apply the angular-momentum product rule when inertia changes.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: This explicitly nonrigid system satisfies .
Hence .
Check: the two angular-momentum derivative terms are and . Zero external torque keeps angular momentum constant rather than angular velocity. This is a counterexample to the rigid-body short form.
Interpret · Foundation
A rigid rotor rotates about a fixed axis with constant and initial . Motor and load simultaneously supply +1.2 and −1.2 , with no other torques. How does evolve during 5 s? A graph shows a horizontal -versus-time line above zero. Is this consistent with Newton’s rotational law?
Show hint
The law uses the sum of torques. Zero angular acceleration preserves the existing angular velocity.
Learning goal: Connect zero resultant torque to constant angular velocity rather than rest.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: sum the directed torques and divide by constant inertia.
Angular acceleration is zero, so stays at +8 for the five seconds.
The graph is correct.
Check: motor and load each transfer 9.6 W with opposite signs; net power and rotational-energy change vanish. Zero resultant torque does not automatically mean rest.
Error analysis · Application
A rigid rotor with has . A constant positive resultant torque +0.40 acts about the same fixed axis for 1.0 s. A solution says: “Positive torque makes the rotor faster.” Calculate after one second and assess angular-speed magnitude; find the rotational-energy change.
Show hint
Positive angular acceleration increases signed angular velocity. With negative initial velocity, its magnitude can decrease.
Learning goal: Interpret torque sign relative to existing rotation direction.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: obtain angular acceleration from torque and add its contribution to the negative initial velocity.
Acceleration is +2 , giving after one second.
Magnitude falls from 6 to 4 , so the rotor slows.
Rotational energy decreases by 2.0 J.
Check: torque and angular velocity have opposite signs throughout the interval, so power is negative.
Choose the model before rearranging
The fixed axis must be at rest relative to an inertial frame, and the body must not change its moment of inertia about that axis during the calculation. Free three-dimensional rotation, deformable bodies, internal rotational degrees of freedom or an arbitrarily moving reference axis require the general angular momentum balance with appropriate reference treatment. The upper example and remains correct: .[2][3]
If still holds, variable I adds the term . Additional relative angular motion can invalidate even this product form unless included in total angular momentum. The most useful check is therefore whether torque, inertia and acceleration refer to the same physical system and axis, rather than numerical substitution alone.[2]
What to remember
Choose the body, axis and positive rotation direction. Sum all external axial torques and use inertia about that same axis. Balanced torques preserve angular velocity when inertia is constant, including during rotation. Coupled cords or rolling additionally require translation and contact constraints.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax UP1 §10.7: Newton’s Second Law for Rotation
- MIT 8.01SC Chapter19: Angular Momentum, fixed-axis component balance
- MIT 8.01SC Chapter21: Rigid Body Dynamics About a Fixed Axis
- OpenStax UP1 §11.1: Rolling Motion
- MIT 8.01SC Chapter20: Rigid Body Kinematics, §20.2 rolling and §§20.4–20.5 energy
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 2 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Linked relevant learning transitions; preserved existing derivations, worked examples, exercises and figures in full.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Added an individual introduction and conclusion, checked existing calculations, clarified notation and model references, and added an original learning figure.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Newton’s second law for rotation. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/newton-rotation-starrer-koerper
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.