Before calculating
You need wavelength conversion, small angles in radians and the idea of a point image. An ideal object point becomes a finite-width optical pattern. Two points therefore form two overlapping patterns. For incoherent sources add intensities without assuming a fixed relative field phase.[1][2]
The comparison uses equal-brightness incoherent point sources and an unobstructed circular uniformly weighted aperture in a diffraction-limited model. D is diameter, not radius. The first dark ring bounds the central Airy disk. This criterion describes that optical model, not automatically eyesight, sensor resolution or detection of an arbitrarily faint companion.[1][3]
A minimum separation under a specified convention
D is the clear diameter of a uniformly illuminated unobstructed circular aperture. λ is wavelength in the propagation medium; θ is calculated in radians.[1]
One point gives an Airy pattern with a central maximum and rings. Two equally bright incoherent points meet Rayleigh’s criterion when one maximum lies at the first minimum of the other. Add their intensity patterns, not their field amplitudes. For coherent sources a fixed relative phase can change the combined image.[3]
θmin is source angular separation and also the angular radius to the first minimum of one point image. It is not the Airy-disk diameter or the full spread angle of an arbitrary source. The central pattern’s diameter between first minima is twice this radius.[1]
Two point images at Rayleigh spacing
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Why a circular aperture gives the factor 1.22
In the Fraunhofer model, field amplitude is proportional to the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the aperture. For a uniformly illuminated circle, integrate over azimuth and then over radius to obtain a Bessel expression. The result is rotationally symmetric. Its zero depends on aperture shape; a slit or rectangular opening has a different pattern.[2][3]
The continuous central limit is one. The first positive minimum occurs where .[3]
A single-point pattern’s first minimum is a diffraction property. Choosing that separation as just resolved is a resolution convention. It does not mean that all information vanishes below that spacing. Measurements with known source models and high signal quality can have different estimation limits.[1]
From radians to arcseconds and image separation
The length ratio first gives an angle in radians. A smaller value means a smaller just-resolved separation and better ideal angular resolution. Focal length enters only when converting that angle into separation on a sensor or screen.[1]
r1 is the first-minimum radius in a paraxial focal plane, not its diameter.[1]
λ and D must use the same length unit. 550 nm with D=0.20 m requires λ=550 × 10−9m first. The ratio is dimensionless but interpreted as an angle in radians. Degrees or arcseconds require conversion. For distant points at range L, corresponding transverse separation is approximately .[1]
In air, vacuum wavelength is often a sufficient approximation for λ. In a medium with relevant index n, . Object-side microscope resolution instead uses the appropriate numerical aperture and vacuum wavelength: . A physical diameter alone does not fully describe high-aperture collection geometry.[1]
A 20-cm telescope in angle and focal plane
Two equally bright incoherent stars in an ideal model
- Given
- D=0.200 m; λ=550 nm in air; f=1.20 m; clear circular aperture, diffraction limited.
- Find
- Find Rayleigh angle, arcseconds and focal-plane separation.
Approach: For equal incoherent point images through a clear circular aperture, find Rayleigh angle and then focal-plane separation.
Convert wavelength to meters and calculate angle.
Convert to arcseconds.
Use focal length to convert to the focal plane.
Result: Rayleigh separation is about 0.692 arcseconds; point-image centers are 4.026μm apart. The Airy diameter between first minima is 8.052μm.
Check: Units check: is dimensionless and fθ is a length. Doubling f enlarges sensor pattern and separation but does not change angular resolution when D stays fixed.
Convert a target angular separation into aperture
0.80 arcseconds at 550 nm
- Given
- Target separation 0.80 arcsec; λ=550 nm; equal incoherent points and ideal clear circular aperture.
- Find
- Find minimum diameter under the Rayleigh model.
Approach: Express target separation in radians first, then solve the circular-aperture criterion for minimum diameter.
Convert arcseconds into radians first.
Rearrange the resolution relation for D.
Result: At least about 17.30 cm clear aperture in the ideal model. This is a diffraction requirement, not a guarantee of a real observation.
Check: Back-substitution gives 0.80 arcsec. A 20-cm system gives 0.692 arcsec and meets the ideal condition;15 cm gives 0.923 arcsec and misses it.
Explore further: f-number and sensor pixels
At fixed λ, doubling D halves Rayleigh angle. Doubling focal length without changing D only increases image scale. The sensor may sample that larger pattern more easily, but optical angular information available before sampling is unchanged. Digital enlargement likewise does not create missing optical detail.[1]
For a camera, where is f-number. This is ideal focal-plane Airy radius. Shorter wavelength gives a smaller pattern for unchanged aperture. Stopping down often reduces aberrations and increases depth of field while enlarging diffraction blur; stopping down indefinitely does not always improve sharpness.[3]
Compare diffraction disk with pixel size
- Given
- λ=550 nm in air; ideal camera lens at N=8; pixel pitch p=3.00 μm. Second comparison at N=16.
- Find
- Find Airy radius, diameter and diameter in pixel pitches.
Approach: use the focal-plane expression with f-number. Calculate radius first and double it for diameter.
Convert nanometres to micrometres and substitute N=8.
At N=16 the geometric pattern dimensions double.
Result: At N=8 the central disk spans about 3.58 pixel pitches; at N=16 it spans 7.16. This is diameter between the first minima.
Check: Doubling N doubles Airy diameter at fixed wavelength. Pixel counts are only a scale comparison, not proof of a general sampling criterion or actual resolution under noise and aberrations.
The thin-lens equation adds geometric image position and scale under suitable imaging assumptions. It does not automatically determine the diffraction separation of two point images; clear aperture, wavelength and the chosen resolution criterion remain essential.[4][1]
Brightness contrast, atmosphere and different pupils
The coefficient 1.22 belongs to the specified unobstructed uniformly weighted circular pupil. Central obstruction, apodization or rectangular apertures alter the central lobe and rings. Broadband light superposes patterns of different sizes. A faint companion can disappear in a bright object’s diffraction rings despite adequate geometric separation; D and λ alone cannot decide detectability.[3]
Atmospheric turbulence, defocus, aberrations, motion, detector noise and sampling further degrade real images. Label the result as an optical reference criterion, not measured instrument resolution. The paraxial far-field form uses small angles; large-angle diffraction geometry retains the sine.[1]
The wave relation for speed, wavelength and frequency helps assign wavelength to its medium: . At the same specified frequency, a different phase speed also means a different wavelength. This assignment replaces neither the circular-aperture assumption nor an assessment of real imaging errors.[5][1]
Five exercises checking angle, color and distance
Calculate · Foundation
D=0.30 m, λ=600 nm: find θmin in radians and arcseconds.
Show hint
Convert nanometers to meters.
Learning goal: Calculate Rayleigh angle and convert angular units.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: convert wavelength to metres, insert clear diameter in Rayleigh’s criterion and then convert from radians.
The result is 2.44 microradians or 0.503286 arcseconds.
Check: both values describe the same angle. Reporting the initial result directly as degrees would confuse angular units even though the length ratio is dimensionless.
Calculate · Application
A 15-cm system observes at 500 nm and 650 nm. How do Rayleigh angles change?
Show hint
For fixed D, θ is proportional to λ.
Learning goal: Check wavelength scaling.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: at fixed diameter Rayleigh angle is proportional to wavelength.
At 500 nm it is 4.06667 microradians or 0.838810 arcseconds; at 650 nm it is 5.28667 microradians or 1.090453 arcseconds.
Check: their ratio 1.30 equals the wavelength ratio. The longer red wavelength gives the larger ideal separation threshold.
Calculate · Application
D=20 cm, λ=550 nm; two points lie 2000 m away. What transverse separation matches ideal Rayleigh angle?
Show hint
Use s≈Lθ with θ in radians.
Learning goal: Convert angular resolution to transverse separation.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: first calculate the circular aperture’s Rayleigh angle, then use viewing distance for small transverse separation.
This gives s≈6.710 mm.
Check: recovers the angle in radians. The small-angle approximation is excellent here; contrast and air turbulence remain additional practical limits.
Interpret · Application
Two equally bright incoherent point sources are separated by 0.8 θR in an ideal circular-aperture image. A second image uses twice the diameter at the same wavelength. Classify both relative to Rayleigh. Does the second guarantee detection under arbitrary noise?
Show hint
Source separation stays fixed while the diffraction limit halves.
Learning goal: Distinguish diffraction limits from measurement guarantees.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Rayleigh separation is inversely proportional to diameter.
The first image lies below the criterion; the second lies at 1.6 times its new threshold.
The second meets the ideal criterion.
Arbitrarily high noise, aberrations or changed contrast can still prevent detection; Rayleigh is not a universal measurement guarantee.
Error analysis · Application
A circular clear aperture has radius 0.10 m. At λ=500 nm someone inserts D=0.10 m into Rayleigh’s criterion. Find correct and incorrect limits and the error factor; assume ideal optics.
Show hint
D denotes diameter.
Learning goal: Distinguish aperture radius and diameter.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Double the given radius first.
With the correct 0.20 m diameter, the threshold is 3.05 microradians; the incorrect substitution gives 6.10 microradians.
It predicts twice as poor angular resolution.
Both calculations have correct units, so dimensional checks alone cannot detect the radius-diameter confusion.
What to take away
Use the same length unit for wavelength and clear diameter and interpret the ratio in radians. Rayleigh separation is a first-minimum radius, not Airy diameter. A larger aperture improves the ideal angular comparison; longer focal length alone enlarges the image. Actual resolution additionally needs contrast, sound imaging and appropriate collection.[1][2]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics3 §4.5: circular apertures and resolution
- MIT2.71 Lecture14: Fraunhofer diffraction and Fourier optics
- BYU Physics of Light and Optics §11.2: circular-pupil Rayleigh criterion
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 3 §2.4: Thin Lenses
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 1 §16.1: Traveling Waves
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Added relevant connections; preserved existing derivations, calculations, exercises, figures and model limits.
- Explained Rayleigh interpretation and Airy derivation; visualized two incoherent point images; added a pixel comparison and model summary.
- Added prerequisites and model assumptions; clarified derivation steps and arithmetic checks; included an additional original example, diagram and summary.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Rayleigh criterion for a circular aperture. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/rayleigh-kriterium-kreisblende
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.