The same potential difference affects charges differently
Positive and negative probes at the same two locations experience the same potential difference but opposite changes in potential energy. Voltage describes the source field; charge connects that field to a particular probe’s energy. Begin with destination minus start and the charge sign.[1]
Distinguish potential-energy change, field work and kinetic-energy change. Field work is the negative potential-energy change. It becomes entirely kinetic energy only when no other force does work. In slow guided transport, an external mechanism supplies or receives the balancing contribution.[1]
How do you calculate signed change in electric potential energy?
V is potential and U here potential energy. In other articles U may denote voltage; do not confuse these quantities.[1]
A positive potential change increases a positive charge’s potential energy but decreases a negative charge’s energy. Field belongs to the fixed source configuration and both endpoints must be specified. The same expression cannot simply be assigned to an uncharged body with an unspecified changing charge; charge must remain constant during the transport.[1]
Potential follows from electric work
For fixed charge and a conservative electrostatic field, the same path relates energy and potential.[1]
Multiply the definition of potential difference by q. This gives and hence . A quasistatic external transport with negligible losses has because kinetic energy is unchanged. Electric field work has the opposite sign. These are two views of the same energy balance, not an additional source of energy. Electric field strength and the selected displacement projection give the same work balance as the potential difference.[1]
This additional equation applies when only the electric field force does work and no other energy change is omitted.[1]
A potential reference shift does not change energy differences
Replace V everywhere by . Then shifts by constant while stays unchanged. Potential-energy differences therefore do not depend on a common reference zero. For multiple sources, first sum scalar potentials at each observation point and then take the difference. Potential can be nonzero at a point where vector field cancels by symmetry.[1][2]
In the test-charge model sources are fixed and backreaction neglected. Building an entire charge configuration requires accounting for work during incremental transport. Thus a linear capacitor stores total energy rather than because voltage grows while charging. The test charge considered here instead crosses an already established potential difference.[3]
How do you convert between joules and electronvolts?
One electronvolt is the energy unit e times 1 V, not a charge or predetermined sign of energy change.[4]
Retain signs; zero potential difference and zero energy change do not determine q.
For charge , energy change in eV is numerically z times potential change in volts, including sign. A probe with across gives ; an electron in the same potential rise instead has −5.0 eV potential-energy change. Any claimed energy gain or loss must therefore specify whether it concerns potential or kinetic energy.[4][1]
Negative probe and accelerated model ion
A negative test charge rises in potential
- Given
- A fixed test charge moves from to . Sources unchanged, conservative field; equal endpoint kinetic energies for the quasistatic additional balance.
- Find
- Find and electric versus quasistatic external work.
Approach: Destination minus starting potential is multiplied by unchanged signed charge. Electric work and quasistatic external work have opposite signs.
Subtract initial potential from final potential.
Multiply by negative charge.
Distinguish work conventions for equal endpoint kinetic energies.
Result: Potential energy decreases by 810 pJ despite increasing potential. Field does positive work; the quasistatic external mechanism receives the same energy.
Check: A common +1000 V offset changes endpoints to 940 V and 1120 V but retains . The quotient also returns 180 V. Signs do not depend on an arbitrary potential reference.
A doubly positive model ion starts at rest
- Given
- and specified model mass . The ion starts at rest at 450 V and reaches 330 V; only electric work, no collisions, no relativistic correction needed.
- Find
- Find energy changes and final speed.
Approach: Starting at rest with electric work alone converts potential-energy loss entirely to kinetic energy, giving nonrelativistic speed.
Potential change is negative.
Field work increases kinetic energy by the same magnitude.
Result: , and . The 120 V drop is not itself the 240 eV energy; double charge provides factor 2.
Check: Using unrounded v, returns . is small, consistent with the nonrelativistic model. Initial and final sums agree.
A charge cannot always reach a potential endpoint
A positive body moving against field force toward higher potential loses kinetic energy. Without an extra drive it can reach only a potential rise . Negative charge reverses the relevant potential trend. Formula calculates energy change for specified endpoints; it does not guarantee that initial motion can actually reach them. Kinetic energy must therefore remain nonnegative along the trajectory actually reached.[1]
For a uniform electrostatic field, links work to projected displacement. Transverse motion along an equipotential changes no potential energy despite possibly nonzero field. At high particle energies the electric work balance remains, but must be replaced by an appropriate relativistic energy expression.[1][2]
Example: a proposed endpoint cannot be reached
A positive model particle slows down
- Given
- A test charge starts at with moving toward . For , , so the field points toward . Only electric work; straight trajectory and nonrelativistic motion.
- Find
- Check a target at 0.400 m and find the turning point.
Approach: Kinetic energy must remain nonnegative along the accessible trajectory. It vanishes at the turning point.
Substitution: For one positive elementary charge, potential rise in volts has the same numerical energy increase in electronvolts.
Result: The target is inaccessible under these conditions. The particle turns at ; formal negative kinetic energy is not a physical state.
Check: Field force opposes initial motion. Its work to the turning point is , exactly the negative initial kinetic energy. Additional external driving would change the assumed balance.
Energy partition up to the turning point
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Five sign and energy checks
Calculate · Foundation
A charge +3.00 μC crosses . Find and field work.
Show hint
Field work is negative potential-energy change.
Learning goal: Calculate signed energy change and field work.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
and .
With only electric work, K increases by 60.0 µJ.
Rearrange · Application
A fixed charge has . Find .
Show hint
Divide by negative charge.
Learning goal: Infer potential difference from negative charge and energy change.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
.
A potential drop increases negative-charge potential energy.
Transfer · Application
An electron initially has 100 eV kinetic energy and must cross without other work. Is the endpoint energetically reachable, and what K remains?
Show hint
gives positive for a potential drop.
Learning goal: Check final electron energy and energetic accessibility.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
, so .
Positive remaining energy does not rule out the endpoint based on its energy.
It alone does not establish accessibility: a larger potential-energy barrier en route could turn the probe back earlier, and trajectory geometry must also allow passage.
On a monotonic decelerating path, the potential drop at the turning point would have magnitude 100 V.
Interpret · Application
Two small probes +2 μC and −2 μC are each moved quasistatically from to in the same unchanged electrostatic field. No dissipative forces occur. Compare ΔU, field work and external work.
Show hint
Both have the same ΔV but opposite charge signs.
Learning goal: Compare signed field work and energy changes for opposite charges.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
gives +60 μJ for the positive probe and −60 μJ for the negative one.
Field work is ; quasistatic external work equals .
Check: external and electric work cancel, consistent with unchanged kinetic energy. Higher potential therefore does not mean higher potential energy for every charge. Small probes leave the sources unchanged.
Error analysis · Foundation
For , and . A solution adds 100 V to both and claims field work has changed. Check using both calculations.
Show hint
The same offset cancels in .
Learning goal: Separate a constant potential offset from potential difference.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: . ΔV stays −20 V before and after the shift, leaving and field work +60 μJ.
Individual and values each increase by 300 μJ, but their difference stays fixed.
Check: a spatially constant offset also leaves the gradient and electric field unchanged. A chosen zero cannot change force or measured work difference.
When a scalar potential difference is insufficient
Path independence assumes a conservative electrostatic field and unchanged charge. With time-dependent magnetic induction, electric work is not generally determined solely by a scalar potential difference between endpoints. Moving sources, radiation, contact reactions or additional forces require fuller energy and field accounting. The test-charge relation does not calculate total self-energy of the source body or universal energy of arbitrary charging processes.[1][3][6]
In brief
Form , multiply by signed charge and identify the energy type. , field work and, where applicable, describe one balance. Then check whether the assumed motion can actually reach the endpoint.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax UP2 §7.2: Electric Potential and Potential Difference
- OpenStax UP2 §7.4: Determining Field from Potential
- OpenStax UP2 §8.3: Energy Stored in a Capacitor
- NIST SP330 §2: SI defining constants and elementary charge
- NIST CODATA2022: full constants table, vacuum permittivity and electron mass
- OpenStax UP2 §16.1: Maxwell’s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Highlighted signed potential-energy change and energy units in question headings; added paragraph connections to field strength and kinetic reachability checks.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Clarified introduction, model connections and solution steps; added an original third example, quantitative diagram and concise summary.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Change in electric potential energy. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/elektrische-potentialenergie-spannung
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.