From observation to a point charge
A rubbed balloon can attract another charged object. Charge on a balloon is spread out and may redistribute. For our first calculation, imagine two small charged bodies held fixed in vacuum. If their sizes are negligible compared with separation, approximate them by charges at two points. The law initially describes their mutual electric force rather than automatically every force acting on them.[1]
- Prior knowledge: charge is measured in coulombs; like signs repel and unlike signs attract.
- Mark both charge locations and choose a positive axis. A negative force sign denotes a component, not a negative strength.
- Separation means distance between charge locations. In an appropriate point approximation these are the centres, not the surface gap.
When does the Coulomb force attract and when does it repel?
F denotes force magnitude on either charge.[1]
The formula for Coulomb force magnitude gives a non-negative value; charge signs determine direction. Like charges repel and unlike charges attract. The two forces have equal magnitude and opposite direction but act on different charges. They do not cancel in the force balance of either individual charge. r is separation of charge locations; for spherical bodies treated as point charges, use centre-to-centre distance.[1]
The unit vector points from q1 to q2; a negative product reverses the force on q2.
A negative force component can be meaningful. A negative magnitude instead indicates that magnitude and direction were mixed. First identify the charge receiving the force and the positive axis direction.
Why is separation squared? For a point source, the same total flux is spread over increasingly large spherical surfaces. Their area grows with the square of radius. This explains distance scaling within the electrostatic model. That charges produce this field is a physical law; geometry alone does not establish it.[1][2]
Understanding the field model
Coulomb’s law is an empirical electrostatic law. Explaining it through Gauss’s law uses the same physical theory, rather than an independent purely geometric proof. For an isolated point charge in vacuum, the electric field is radial with equal magnitude everywhere at equal radius.[2]
Spherical symmetry lets the radial field component be taken outside the surface integral.
Field and force are related by charge q2.
This gives . Without spherical symmetry, is not automatically valid. Gauss’s law still applies, but the field cannot be removed from the integral in that way.
Units and inverse squares
Use coulombs and metres: , and . Convert first, then square r. Introductory calculations can use ke ≈ 8.99·109 N·m2/C2. This is rounded; CODATA reports vacuum permittivity with measurement uncertainty.[5]
Charge units and area units cancel.
With fixed charges, doubling distance gives one quarter of the force, not one half. Halving distance quadruples it. Doubling both charge magnitudes and distance leaves force unchanged because numerator and denominator both grow by four.
Double separation, one quarter of the force
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Two complete worked examples
Attraction with microcoulombs
- Given
- on the left, on the right; in vacuum.
- Find
- Find force magnitude and direction on q2.
Approach: For stationary vacuum point charges, find Coulomb force magnitude; a negative charge product gives leftward attraction on the right charge.
Convert charges and distance to SI.
Use the product magnitude and square the distance.
Use charge signs to determine direction.
Result: Force on q2 is about 0.599 N and points left toward q1.
Check: Force on q1 is equally large and points right. At 60 cm separation, magnitude would be about 0.150 N.
Finding separation from force
- Given
- Two fixed point charges of +4 nC each; force magnitude 2.0·10−5 N in vacuum.
- Find
- Calculate separation.
Approach: In the vacuum point-charge model, solve the measured force magnitude for positive separation.
Solve for positive separation.
Substitute SI values.
Take the square root and convert to centimetres.
Result: Separation is about 8.48 cm; the charges repel.
Check: Substituting reproduces the given force. Do not omit the square root.
Multiple charges: how do you calculate the net force?
Calculate each force on the same selected charge and add components. For extended charge distributions, the sum becomes an integral over small charge elements. Adding magnitudes alone is valid only when all forces point in the same direction. If the summed components are perpendicular, the Pythagorean theorem gives the magnitude of the net force. For charges on a straight line, as in the following example, instead add signed components along that line.[1][3]
Original symmetry problem: two +2 nC charges lie at and . Each exerts 4.495·10−7 N on +1 nC at the origin. The left source pushes right and the right source pushes left, giving zero net force. Doubling the right source to +4 nC gives a net 4.495·10−7 N leftward.
Two sources: equal distances, unequal charges
- Given
- In vacuum, +2 nC is at and +4 nC at . A positive +1 nC probe is at the origin; both sources remain fixed.
- Find
- Find both force components and the net force on the probe.
Approach: each source repels the probe. The left source pushes right and the right source pushes left. Add signed components.
Substitute and charges in coulombs.
Result: The net force points left and has magnitude 0.4495 µN.
Check: At equal separation the right source produces twice the force. Setting both sources to +2 nC makes the opposite contributions equal and their sum zero.
Explore further: Material response and bonding
For an ideal homogeneous, isotropic linear dielectric, an appropriate macroscopic model uses . The corresponding force is reduced by εr compared with the same free point charges in vacuum. Dimensionless εr differs from ε measured in F/m.[4]
An arbitrary material number does not describe every real environment. Interfaces, anisotropy, conductors, nonlinear polarisation and local microscopic structure can require another model. Distinguish ε0 for vacuum from ε for an explicitly appropriate material model.
Salt dissolution cannot be explained by material permittivity alone. Interactions with the solvent and solution conditions also matter. A salt may have low solubility even when its small dissolved fraction largely separates into ions. Solubility and degree of dissociation are distinct questions.[6]
Limits of point charges
An extended charged body is not automatically a point charge. Charge distribution and observation distance matter. Far from a body compared with its size, a point model may approximate its field. An isolated spherical distribution has the exact external field of a central point charge. Nearby conductors can redistribute charge.[3][2]
The expression is undefined at r = 0. In atomic or nuclear problems, classical electrostatic force is not a complete account of all interactions or stable trajectories. Moving charges can additionally require magnetic effects and time-dependent fields. Coulomb’s electrostatic model alone does not answer those questions.
Five problems with solutions
Calculate · Foundation
, , in vacuum. Find F and attraction or repulsion.
Show hint
Use the magnitude of the product.
Learning goal: Calculate Coulomb magnitude and identify attraction.
Show solution and calculation
Model and approach: Stationary point charges in vacuum; first convert separation and charges to SI.
The charges attract.
Check: .
Interpret · Application
One charge doubles and distance halves. By what factor does F change?
Show hint
Consider the numerator and squared denominator separately.
Learning goal: Combine inverse-square distance and charge scaling.
Show solution and calculation
Model and approach: Keep the other quantities fixed; compare charge and distance factors separately.
The factor is .
Force becomes eight times larger.
Calculate · Application
Two electrostatic forces on the same charge are perpendicular: 3 mN right and 4 mN up. Find the resultant magnitude.
Show hint
Combine perpendicular components with the Pythagorean theorem.
Learning goal: Combine perpendicular force components.
Show solution and calculation
Model and approach: Both forces act on the same charge and are perpendicular.
.
Adding magnitudes to obtain 7 mN would be incorrect.
Check: .
Interpret · Application
Two identical positive point charges sit in vacuum at x=−a and x=+a, a>0. A small negative test charge at x=0 does not disturb them. Describe the two forces on the probe and their sum. Does each individual force vanish?
Show hint
Both sources are equally distant; their attractions point to opposite sides.
Learning goal: Use symmetry and superposition with nonzero individual forces.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: both Coulomb magnitudes are .
The left force points along −x, the right along +x, so they cancel.
Each remains nonzero for nonzero charges.
Check: cancellation relies on equal distances and charge magnitudes, not absence of interaction. Moving away from the midpoint changes the symmetry.
Error analysis · Foundation
Two free positive point charges repel in vacuum. A solution claims: “Action equals reaction, so each charge has zero net force.” Identify the bodies on which the Coulomb forces act. Do unequal masses change their force magnitudes?
Show hint
Only forces acting on the same body enter its motion equation.
Learning goal: Avoid cancelling interaction pairs in a single-body balance.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: the opposite forces act on different charges.
Each experiences the other’s force and can accelerate.
With no external forces, only the sum for the combined system vanishes.
Unequal masses do not change the common Coulomb magnitude for fixed charges and separation; they change accelerations.
Check: the interaction-pair vector relation still holds for unequal masses.
What to take away
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 1, 2026
- OpenStax, University Physics 2 §5.3: Coulomb’s Law
- OpenStax, University Physics 2 §6.3: Applying Gauss’s Law
- OpenStax, University Physics 2 §5.5: Calculating Electric Fields of Charge Distributions
- OpenStax, University Physics 2 §8.5: Molecular Model of a Dielectric
- NIST, 2022 CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants
- OpenStax, Chemistry 2e §11.2: Electrolytes
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Distinguished Coulomb force, signs and non-negative magnitude directly; linked the electric-field explanation and Pythagoras only for perpendicular summed components, and made the material model discoverable through a question.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Added an accessible entry and prerequisites, explained model steps, and added a complete example and quantitative diagram; retained existing examples, five exercises and sources.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Coulomb's Law. Updated October 1, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/coulomb-gesetz
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.