Separate state change from the actual path
First identify the two equilibrium states being compared. Their difference is independent of the actual path. During a rapid or irreversible process, one temperature for the whole system may not even exist. A reversible comparison path therefore serves as a calculation route between the same endpoints. Its heat may differ from actual heat, but its temperature is well defined for the small equilibrium steps.[1]
T is absolute temperature along the reversible comparison path.
Entropy is measured in J/K and, as an extensive quantity, increases with system size. Specific entropy is per mass; molar entropy is per amount of substance. Entropy of an individual body may decrease, for instance during cooling. Nonnegativity applies to generation or to the total change of an isolated assembly. Do not confuse one system’s change with entropy generated by the overall process.[4]
When does the reversible-heat quotient apply at constant temperature?
Constant T is a path condition, not merely an initial-temperature specification.
If a system reversibly absorbs 600 J at constant 300 K, its entropy increases by 2 J/K. Reversibly rejecting the same amount at that temperature changes entropy by −2 J/K. Constant allows it to be taken outside the integral. However, isothermal alone does not establish reversibility: an irreversible isothermal process can generate entropy. Likewise, adiabatic only means no actual heat flows. Only additionally reversible adiabats have .[3]
Does reversibility mean zero entropy change?
Closed system; Tb is local absolute temperature at the heat-transfer boundary. Add contributions for multiple boundary locations.[3]
For the actual process, separate entropy transferred by heat from entropy generation. is local absolute temperature at the chosen heat-transfer boundary, not an arbitrary mean body temperature. An ideal large reservoir’s own entropy change is because its state retains constant temperature. Which sub-balance includes a transfer layer and its generation depends on the system boundary. The complete process total remains unambiguous.
In this closed macroscopic balance, work transports energy but not entropy through a term. Dissipation of work by friction can nevertheless generate entropy within the system. In open systems, incoming and outgoing matter also carries entropy. These streams require additional terms; the closed-system balance shown here is then insufficient.
Evaluate a reversible gas path explicitly
For a simple compressible system of fixed composition, the first is a state relation; the next two assume an ideal gas.[2]
The integrated form uses constant molar CV; otherwise integrate its temperature dependence.
The first law and ideal-gas equation make the comparison calculable. Solve the state relation for , then insert ideal-gas internal energy and pressure. The integral separates into temperature and volume contributions. Equal endpoint temperatures leave . A reversible isothermal comparison also has . These heat and work values are not automatically those of the actual irreversible path. Both logarithms require dimensionless ratios. The isothermal work of an ideal gas here belongs to the selected reversible comparison path.[2]
Example: free expansion with Q = 0
There are two paths with the same endpoints: actual free expansion and an imagined reversible isothermal expansion. Only the second is used in the entropy integral. The actual path’s energy balance remains unchanged.[6][5]
Separate the reversible comparison from the experiment
- Given
- of ideal gas initially at 340 K in 2.00 L. Removing a partition allows free expansion into vacuum to 5.00 L in an isolated rigid vessel. Equilibrium endpoints; no other energy changes. .
- Find
- Find T2, ΔS and comparison heat Qrev.
Approach: First balance the actual isolated expansion into vacuum. Then find the entropy difference through a hypothetical reversible isothermal path between the same equilibrium states.
First balance energy for the actual process.
Use a reversible isothermal gas path between endpoints.
Calculate heat on the comparison path only.
Result: In the ideal model the gas remains at 340 K, while entropy increases by about 5.714 J/K. No heat was actually transferred.
Check: The isolated whole vessel generates . The reversible comparison expansion would receive heat and deliver work; its 1942.6 J must not be assigned to the actual free expansion. For real gases, does not generally imply unchanged T.
Example: finite bodies equalise temperatures
Direct temperature equalisation conserves energy but generates entropy. First use the two heat capacities to determine their common final temperature. Then calculate each body’s state change through an imagined reversible heating or cooling path. Precisely because the bodies have different temperatures, the total transferred heat cannot be divided by one temperature.[5]
Combine conservation with two entropy integrals
- Given
- Two rigid bodies without phase changes have constant total heat capacities and . Initial temperatures are 600 K and 300 K. They contact in an isolated assembly with no work and negligible contact-layer energy.
- Find
- Find final temperature and total entropy change.
Approach: The isolated assembly conserves energy. For each body use its constant heat capacity and absolute initial and final temperatures to determine entropy change.
Energy lost by A equals energy gained by B.
Integrate reversible heating or cooling comparisons for each body.
Calculate the second contribution and sum.
Result: Final temperature is 412.5 K, transferred energy 33,750 J and total entropy increases by 28.09 J/K.
Check: . Assembly energy stays constant although its entropy grows. Dividing heat by only the initial or final temperature would be wrong for each finite body.
View diagram: entropy during temperature equalisation
Energy equalisation generates entropy
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Treat temperature change and phase change separately
C is total heat capacity appropriate to the chosen reversible heating path.[1]
A reversible phase transition maintains constant coexistence temperature. With positive appropriate , melting or vaporisation gives and ; reversal gives negative values. Substance, transition and pressure must match the tabulated value. For example, a hypothetical transition involving 1500 J at 280 K gives +5.357 J/K and −5.357 J/K on reversible reversal. Heating before or after transition occurs at varying temperature and needs its own integral.[1]
Count melting and warming separately
Two temperature conditions in one calculation
- Given
- 60.0 g pure ice at 0 °C is completely melted near normal atmospheric pressure and then warmed to 20 °C. Specified constant model values: latent heat 333000 J/kg and water heat capacity 4182 J/(kg·K). Calculate the water’s state change, not entropy of the whole heating apparatus.
- Find
- Find heat requirement and entropy change of the substance.
Approach: a reversible comparison melts at constant and then warms at varying . Add the two state contributions.
Insert absolute temperatures and calculate both heat stages.
Evaluate the melting contribution and temperature integral separately.
Result: Heat is about 25.00 kJ. Entropy increases by about 90.88 J/K; both contributions are positive.
Check: The melting contribution satisfies . Warming is not isothermal, so its contribution must lie between and , in J/K. The substance’s entropy change alone does not establish whether the actual heating apparatus is reversible.
Explore further: entropy in a cycle
Every complete cycle gives zero entropy change of the working medium: its final state is its initial state. A reversible closed path therefore has . The actual closed cycle instead has . An irreversible cycle can export generated entropy through heat rejection and still restore its initial state. Equality in a sub-balance means no generation inside its boundary; fully reversible operation additionally requires reversible coupling to the surroundings.[4]
Entropy is not energy in joules or a direct measure of disorder in an arbitrary picture. The thermodynamic calculation used here requires equilibrium endpoints, absolute temperatures and a suitable material model. Reactions, mixing and open mass transport need additional contributions. The gas-volume formula cannot be applied to those cases without checking.
Five solved entropy exercises
Calculate · Foundation
A system rejects 900 J reversibly at constant 360 K. Find its ΔS and that of an equal-temperature reservoir.
Show hint
Q is negative for the system.
Learning goal: Balance system and reservoir entropy during reversible rejection.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: reversible isothermal rejection has , using negative system heat.
; reservoir ; total zero.
System entropy may decrease.
Transfer · Application
A body with constant heats from 300 to 450 K. Find ΔS.
Show hint
Temperature varies; integrate .
Learning goal: Integrate entropy change for varying temperature.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: constant and changing give .
.
; would not be the correct state change.
Calculate · Application
600 J flows directly from a 500 K reservoir to a 300 K reservoir. Find ΔStotal.
Show hint
Use each reservoir’s own constant temperature.
Learning goal: Find entropy production across a finite temperature difference.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: each reservoir retains its own temperature.
Divide each signed heat amount by that temperature and add.
The hot reservoir loses 1.20 J/K and the cold one gains 2.00 J/K.
Their sum is +0.80 J/K.
Direct transfer across the finite temperature difference generates entropy and is irreversible.
Energy is nevertheless conserved.
Interpret · Challenge
An ideal gas freely expands into vacuum inside an isolated rigid overall vessel, doubling its gas volume. Initial and final equilibrium temperatures match. For the gas , . Give ΔS in units of nR and explain why is not the entropy change.
Show hint
Entropy is a state function; Qrev belongs to a comparison path.
Learning goal: Use a reversible comparison path despite irreversible actual motion.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: a reversible isothermal comparison path between the same states gives .
The actual path transfers no heat but generates entropy.
In this isolated model .
Check: the actual first-law balance gives , consistent with equal T but not requiring . The shortcut cannot use actual irreversible heat instead.
Error analysis · Foundation
A system absorbs 1000 J reversibly and isothermally at 27 °C. A solution gives . Correct it and explain why the Celsius number cannot be substituted.
Show hint
Convert temperature to kelvin first.
Learning goal: Use absolute temperature in the entropy formula.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: , giving .
Celsius has an offset zero; entropy uses absolute temperature, not a temperature difference.
Check: ΔS×T reconstructs 1000 J. Moving a temperature-scale zero cannot change a thermodynamic state change, but the incorrect calculation would do exactly that.
In brief
Identify equilibrium endpoints and choose a reversible comparison connecting them. Only constant comparison temperature turns the integral into a simple quotient. Actual heat instead belongs in a balance with the appropriate boundary temperature and entropy generation. One system may lose entropy; total change of an isolated assembly is nonnegative.
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics 2 §4.6: Entropy
- MIT Unified Engineering §5.4: Entropy Changes in an Ideal Gas
- MIT Unified Engineering §6.5: Irreversibility and Entropy Changes
- MIT Unified Engineering §5.1: Concept and Statements of the Second Law
- MIT Unified Engineering §5.5: Calculation of Entropy Change in Basic Processes
- MIT Unified Engineering §4.2: Free versus Reversible Isothermal Expansion
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Highlighted constant comparison temperature and the distinction between entropy change and reversibility in question headings; added relevant gas-work and phase-transition links.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Reworked the introduction and explanations; added a third complete example, an original quantitative diagram and a short summary. Retained existing exercises, models and sources; clarified mathematical typography and model conditions.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Entropy change along a reversible path. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/entropie-reversibel-isotherm
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.