Two parallel axes, one centre of mass
The centre of mass is the object’s mass-weighted mean position. For a uniform thin rod it lies at the midpoint. Shifting to the end axis now requires the same axis orientation, such as perpendicular to the rod in both cases. A longitudinal and a transverse axis are not such a pair.[1]
M is the total mass of the same object; d is the shortest perpendicular distance between the parallel axes.[1]
The centre of mass fixes the reference axis location, while the target axis fixes its orientation. “Through the centre of mass” alone is insufficient: that axis must be parallel to the new axis. For positive mass, ; among parallel shifts, the centre-of-mass axis has the smallest mass moment. Translation along the same axis line gives .[1]
The centre axis gives the minimum
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Explore further: Integral proof in centre-of-mass coordinates
Choose the centre-of-mass axis as z. The parallel target axis through (a,b) gives each mass element squared distance . Coordinates x and y are measured from the centre of mass. Expand the squares and integrate each term.[1]
At the centre of mass, the first moments and are zero.[1]
The addition depends only on total mass and axis distance. For a reference axis not passing through the centre of mass, cross terms generally remain.[1]
Rearrange and check the geometry
A real distance requires . The square root gives a distance magnitude, not direction.[1]
All inertia terms and have units kg·m2. Use metres for d; a distance of 30 cm gives . An area second moment instead shifts by and has units m4. It cannot be used in the same energy balance or in .[1]
For two parallel axes A and B neither passing through the centre of mass, refer both to the same centre-of-mass axis: . Do not simply add M times their mutual separation squared. A change in orientation, such as from a rod’s longitudinal axis to a transverse one, also needs a different reference moment.[1]
The inverse requires and a positive inertia difference. At with equal moments, the equation does not determine mass; different moments about an identical parallel axis are incompatible with this model.[1]
From a rod to a composite rotor
A uniform thin rod
- Given
- and length ; the target axis passes through an end perpendicular to the rod. The known parallel centre-of-mass axis has .
- Find
- Find inertia about the end.
Approach: A uniform rod’s centre of mass is at its midpoint. Its end axis stays parallel to the centre axis, with half the rod length between them.
Substitution: Use the specified masses and perpendicular axis distances in SI units.
Add the shift contribution.
Result: The end axis has , four times the centre-of-mass value.
Check: Independent integral: . Both axes have the same orientation; d is not the full rod length.
Two small disks, two axes
- Given
- Two uniform thin disks each have and . Their centres lie at on a massless frame. All axes are perpendicular to the disk plane.
- Find
- Find I about the combined centre-of-mass axis and a parallel axis shifted by 0.20 m along +x.
Approach: Each disk retains intrinsic inertia about its parallel central axis. First add both disk contributions about the combined centre of mass, then shift the total mass.
Substitution: Use the specified masses and perpendicular axis distances in SI units.
Shift the whole object using its total mass 1.0 kg.
Result: and . Here the disks should not be treated as particles without intrinsic contributions.
Check: Direct distances to the target axis are 0.10 and 0.50 m. Thus . This verifies the whole-body shift.
Explore further: Composite objects and removed material
Every component moment must use parallel axes and distance to the common target axis.[1]
For an asymmetric arrangement, the combined centre of mass is not automatically at the geometric midpoint. Find its location first if you need the combined . A hole can be subtracted as missing material when it has the same assumed density; total mass and possibly centre of mass change. Negative bookkeeping contributions represent removed material, not physically negative mass.[1]
Moment of inertia of a system of particles sums contributions from the actual mass distribution to the chosen axis. For the extended components considered here, retain intrinsic inertia as well; shifting the reference does not automatically turn a small disk into a point mass.[1]
Use the same axis in energy and dynamics
A door rotates about a hinge line near its edge, and a pendulum about its suspension. Both equations of motion need inertia about that actual axis. The centre-of-mass moment alone underestimates resistance to angular acceleration. For pure fixed rotation, ; alternatively, add centre-of-mass translation and intrinsic rotation.[2]
The same energy in two descriptions: rotation about A, or intrinsic rotation plus centre-of-mass motion. Do not then add translational energy a second time.[2]
Rotational energy of a rigid body requires inertia about the actual axis used. The parallel-axis theorem supplies that axial value; it creates no extra energy term beyond the already equivalent descriptions.[2]
Five exercises with solutions
Calculate · Foundation
An object with and has a parallel axis 0.25 m away. Find IA.
Show hint
Add , not Md.
Learning goal: Add the quadratic offset contribution to centre-of-mass inertia.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: The reference is the parallel centre-of-mass axis, so .
.
Thus .
It exceeds , as required for a centre-of-mass reference axis.
Calculate · Application
, and to a parallel centre-of-mass axis. Find .
Show hint
Subtract the addition when reversing the shift.
Learning goal: Recover centre-of-mass inertia from an offset axis.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Returning to the parallel centre-of-mass axis requires subtracting the shift contribution.
.
Check: . A negative result would signal inconsistent data or an unsuitable axis assumption.
Error analysis · Application
For and , parallel axes A and B lie 0.20 m and 0.50 m from the same centre-of-mass axis on the same side. Find IA and IB.
Show hint
Shift each axis separately from the centre of mass.
Learning goal: Compare two noncentral parallel axes through their common centre-of-mass axis.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Both axes share the same known centre reference; calculate and separately.
and .
Their mutual separation is 0.30 m; would be wrong.
Correctly, .
Interpret · Application
A rigid 2.0 kg body has about a specified centre-of-mass axis. A graph plots I for parallel axes against signed displacement d to the right or left. Find I at , 0 and +0.30 m. What shape and minimum must the curve have?
Show hint
Axis offset enters quadratically. Axes stay parallel; only their position changes.
Learning goal: Infer symmetry of an inertia–offset graph from the parallel-axis theorem.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: use the stated centre-of-mass axis as the reference and add the quadratic offset contribution.
Both offsets ±0.30 m give ; the centre axis gives 0.12 kg·m2.
The curve is an upward parabola with its minimum at .
Check: the added term is never negative; displacement cannot lower inertia below the centre value for this family of parallel axes.
Error analysis · Application
A massless rigid rod carries two point masses of 0.50 kg each at , with centre of mass at the origin. Axis A is the x-axis along the rod; axis B is the z-axis through the same origin. A solution uses in the parallel-axis theorem and states . Check using the point masses’ perpendicular distances to each axis.
Show hint
The axes intersect but are not parallel. Use the definition of mass moment of inertia separately for each axis.
Learning goal: Avoid replacing axis orientation by separation alone.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: perpendicular distances are zero for both point masses about the x-axis, but 0.40 m about the z-axis.
Thus and .
The parallel-axis theorem does not apply to this axis pair.
Check: sharing a centre of mass does not specify orientation. Zero inertia here belongs to ideal point masses on a massless line, not a rod with finite cross-section.
What the theorem does not replace
The parallel-axis theorem is a geometric identity for the given mass distribution. It requires neither a particular rotation rate nor equilibrium. Its use in rigid-body dynamics nevertheless requires an appropriate description of that distribution during the motion. If liquid moves within a tank, centre of mass and inertia must be recalculated; the theorem does not supply one permanently constant rotor value.[1]
For nonparallel axes, use direct calculation or an inertia tensor with transformed directions. Even a correct separation cannot rescue a wrongly oriented centre-of-mass axis. Record shape, density assumption and axis direction for every tabulated value before adding the shift term.[3]
Key points
Check that the axes are parallel and the reference axis passes through the centre of mass. Add using total mass and perpendicular axis separation. Composite objects retain intrinsic moments; avoid counting rotational and translational energy twice.
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics 1, §10.5: Calculating Moments of Inertia
- OpenStax University Physics 1, §10.4: Moment of Inertia and Rotational Kinetic Energy
- MIT 16.07 Dynamics, Lecture L26: 3D Rigid Body Dynamics: The Inertia Tensor
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 2 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Linked mass distribution and rotational energy and added conditions of the mass inverse; preserved geometry, examples, exercises and figure.
- Clarified the entry and learning transitions; checked and refined existing exercise solutions, typeset mathematical prose and added an original quantitative article figure.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Parallel-axis theorem for mass moment of inertia. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/massentraegheitsmoment-parallelachsensatz
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.