What does electric energy density in vacuum describe?
Energy is not confined to moving objects. An electric field also contains energy, for example between charged capacitor plates. Energy density tells how much occupies a small volume. Total energy therefore also needs the volume and spatial field distribution. We first examine a uniform vacuum field, then a varying field and a finite region around a charge.[1]
is the electric component of vacuum energy density; a simultaneous magnetic field has its own contribution.[1][2]
The vector is dotted with itself: . Negative components thus do not make energy density negative. Its unit is J/m3 rather than joules. Doubling field magnitude under the same model multiplies local energy density by four. Doubling the observed volume at unchanged density instead doubles energy.[1]
The basic relation gives electric-field energy in vacuum. In a material, simply replacing the vacuum constant requires justification: polarization and what is held fixed belong to the model. The later extension explains this distinction.[1][6]
Obtain density from ideal plate energy
For the ideal uniform vacuum gap, is the field volume.[1]
Insert geometric capacitance and uniform voltage relation into linear capacitor energy. Remaining is , motivating the local vacuum expression through the plate model. Its general application to electric vacuum fields belongs to electromagnetic energy balance; one component model alone does not prove every spatial or time-dependent field. Energy in the capacitor here checks the same vacuum region rather than providing an additional energy contribution.[1][2]
Only constant field magnitude permits density to be taken outside the integral; otherwise evaluate it locally.[1]
Do not confuse volume density with radiation flux
The rearrangement yields only nonnegative field magnitude, not direction.
For uniform density, regional energy is times volume in cubic metres, not surface area. Density alone determines no transported power. Electromagnetic energy flux also requires field geometry and magnetic field or the Poynting vector. At , the result is approximately 0.0443 J/m3. We use rounded measured CODATA-2022 vacuum permittivity rather than calling it an exact SI definition. The Poynting vector and electromagnetic energy flux describe that transport rather than simply stored volume density.[4][2]
Uniform field and spatial variation
Energy in a vacuum plate gap
- Given
- Large parallel plates: , , . Ideal uniform vacuum gap, fringe fields neglected.
- Find
- Find E, , gap volume and stored energy.
Approach: A uniform vacuum field has the same electric energy density throughout the gap, permitting multiplication by the actual gap volume.
Find field and volume from geometry.
Multiply density by volume.
Result: Local density ≈ 0.177084 J/m3 and gap energy ≈ 2.12501 μJ. Model surface area is not confused with volume.
Check: Independently: ≈ 26.5626 pF. gives 2.12501 μJ. Both calculations describe the same uniform gap energy, not separate terms to be added.
A linear vacuum field over a selected region
- Given
- A prescribed quasistatic model has along +x for . , and constant cross-section . Required source distribution is prescribed; calculate only energy in this vacuum region.
- Find
- Integrate energy density and compare with incorrectly squaring mean field.
Approach: Square the prescribed linear field locally first. Constant cross-section then reduces the volume integral to a position integral.
Local density grows quadratically with x.
Here the volume integral becomes A times the x integral.
Correct mean of E2 differs from square of mean E.
Result: Regional energy is ≈ 0.478126 μJ. Substituting mean field would underestimate it by 25%.
Check: Maximum density 0.0039843845 J/m3 times volume 0.000360 m3 divided by 3 gives the same result. The linear field is not charge free: , so Gauss requires . This is not claimed to be an arbitrary source-free vacuum Laplace solution.
Why must you square the field before spatial averaging?
Linear field, quadratically growing energy density
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
For a spatial distribution, first form and then integrate. Equal regions with opposite field directions can have mean field vector zero while both contain energy. Squaring a superposed field also produces cross terms. Simply adding individual source-field energies therefore need not equal total-field energy; interaction contributions may matter.[2][3]
The cross term explains why field energy is not merely a sum of positive individual self-energies.
Explore further: Field energy in reversible dielectrics
For a linear reversible isotropic dielectric, suitable electrostatic energy density can be written with . It then includes material polarization in that model rather than unchanged pure vacuum-field energy. Nonlinear reversible response requires actual construction accounting ; with hysteresis or loss, stored energy is not all supplied work.[3][6]
Total electromagnetic vacuum energy also includes magnetic term . In a plane vacuum wave electric and magnetic contributions are equal, whereas a static electric capacitor does not automatically have that magnetic contribution. Distinguish total field energy from electric-field energy when comparing values.[2][6]
Five density and volume exercises
Calculate · Foundation
A vacuum field has magnitude . Find .
Show hint
Square field magnitude and multiply by .
Learning goal: Calculate vacuum energy density from field magnitude.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
≈ 0.0110677 J/m3.
It is one quarter of the upper 105 V/m example because field is halved.
Rearrange · Application
Uniform electric energy density 0.0200 J/m3 fills the selected vacuum volume 8.00×10−4 m3. Find energy and field magnitude.
Show hint
Energy is density times volume; E requires a separate square root.
Learning goal: Infer energy and field magnitude from density and volume.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
.
From , magnitude is approximately 67213.4 V/m.
Field direction remains unknown.
Interpret · Application
Two equal vacuum subvolumes have fields and with . What is the volume-averaged energy density?
Show hint
Both local squares stay positive.
Learning goal: Distinguish mean squared field from square of mean field.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
Mean field vector is zero, but mean energy density is ≈ 0.00177084 J/m3.
Averaging field before squaring would incorrectly give zero.
Interpret · Application
Two uniform fields of magnitude overlap in the same vacuum volume. Compare energy density for parallel co-directed, perpendicular and antiparallel fields with . These are not separate subvolumes.
Show hint
The squared sum vector includes a cross term.
Learning goal: Add overlapping fields vectorially before squaring.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
Co-directed fields give magnitude and density .
Perpendicular fields give squared magnitude and density .
Antiparallel fields cancel, so total electric-field energy density vanishes.
Check: the cross term is positive, zero or negative. Simply adding separate densities works for the perpendicular case, not general spatial overlap.
Error analysis · Challenge
An ideal isolated parallel-plate capacitor keeps the same free plate charge. A linear dielectric with completely replaces vacuum, geometry unchanged, fringing neglected. A solution claims: “, so density quadruples.” Check it.
Show hint
Fixed free charge fixes D, not E.
Learning goal: Account for boundary conditions when permittivity changes.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
stays constant for fixed free plate charge and area.
Thus E falls to one quarter and also falls to one quarter.
Check: capacitance quadruples, so fixed-Q energy falls to one quarter. A factor-four increase would fit fixed E, such as constant voltage with unchanged geometry. Field energy is distinct from the complete mechanical and source balance.
Ideal point sources expose a self-energy limit
For a point Coulomb field, grows as . Radial volume integration contributes , leaving divergent self-energy as r approaches zero. The local vacuum expression alone therefore gives no finite classical self-energy for an ideal point electron. Extended sources, a prescribed excluded radius or a different physical description change the problem. The finite region in the second example is explicitly a selected portion rather than automatically total energy of all sources.[3][1]
Example: energy in a spherical shell
Finite energy between two radii
- Given
- A conducting sphere of radius carries . Other sources vanish. Find only vacuum field energy from a to , not all energy outside the sphere.
- Find
- Find shell energy and its share of total exterior field energy.
Approach: spherical symmetry gives the radial field; a volume shell has size .
Substitution: a finite inner radius avoids the point-source divergence.
Result: The shell contains about 0.449 μJ, half the total exterior field energy.
Check: Check: sphere capacitance gives , not just shell energy. This small shell holds half the energy because density increases strongly towards the inner radius.
What to take away
Square the actual total field and integrate density over the selected volume. Squaring a mean field does not replace averaging its square. Vacuum density alone is neither a material-energy balance nor transported power. Also specify whether electric or total electromagnetic energy is required.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax UP2 §8.3: Energy Stored in a Capacitor
- OpenStax UP2 §16.3: Energy Carried by Electromagnetic Waves
- MIT8.02 Chapter5: Capacitance and Dielectrics
- NIST CODATA2022: full constants table, vacuum permittivity and electron mass
- OpenStax UP2 §6.2: Explaining Gauss’s Law
- MIT Haus/Melcher §11.4: Energy Storage
- OpenStax, University Physics Volume 2, §6.3: Applying Gauss’s Law — spherical symmetry
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Refined question headings and relevant paragraph links; preserved existing scientific explanations, worked examples and exercises.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
- Revised the introduction and learning sequence, added a third model example and quantitative diagram; reviewed existing exercises, assumptions and mathematical notation.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Electric-field energy density in vacuum. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/elektrische-feldenergiedichte
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.