Distinguish two kinds of surface
The four laws answer two kinds of questions: how much field flux passes through a closed enclosure, and how strongly does a field circulate around a closed curve? Flux counts the component normal to an area. Circulation counts the component along a curve. Both sum contributions over the complete geometry rather than giving a field value at one point. This lets us first understand the roles of charge, current and changing fields without differential calculus.[1]
A closed enclosing surface uses an outward normal on every area element and has no boundary. A spanning open surface instead has a closed boundary curve C; its normal and positive direction around C are paired by the right-hand rule. Gauss’s laws use the enclosing surface, while Faraday and Ampère–Maxwell use the loop and its spanning surface.[1]
These quantities are oriented: reversing field or current direction changes their sign.[3]
The circulation laws below use fixed loops and spanning surfaces. Moving conductors additionally require the motional force per charge. In the displayed E/B form, Q, ρ and J denote total charge, total charge density and total charge current excluding the separate displacement-current term; in matter this includes bound contributions. Vacuum has no material contributions. Macroscopic D/H notation instead separates free sources from polarization and magnetization.[3]
The four laws and what they say
Electric and magnetic Gauss laws balance closed surfaces; Faraday and Ampère–Maxwell balance circulations.[1][2]
Electric charge fixes net E flux through an enclosure. Net B flux is zero in classical electromagnetism without magnetic monopoles. Changing magnetic flux creates electric circulation. Total charge current through the selected spanning surface and change of its electric flux determine magnetic circulation. These are four field laws, rather than four rearrangements of one elementary equation.[1]
Zero net flux means neither zero field nor zero flux through every partial surface. Similarly, zero circulation only says that contributions cancel around the whole curve. Determining a local field requires spatial information, boundary conditions and, where available, symmetry.[3]
Why displacement current is needed
While an ideal capacitor charges, conduction current reaches a metal plate but does not cross its vacuum gap. One spanning surface for a given boundary can intersect the supply wire; another can pass through the gap. Counting only conduction current would assign different values to the same B circulation. The changing electric flux resolves that contradiction.[1][2]
Displacement current here is a field-change term; it does not imply charge transport through the vacuum gap.[2]
The equality uses matching orientations and the full associated flux. A smaller partial surface in the gap encloses only its share. Conduction and displacement current must be evaluated on the same spanning surface; adding the full wire current to the full gap term would count the same source twice.[3]
The capacitance of a capacitor relates plate charge to voltage in the linear model: . At fixed , . This terminal relation helps determine charging current; the Ampère–Maxwell balance still requires electric flux and charge current on the same chosen spanning surface.[1][2]
Explore further: From flux balances to local derivatives
The divergence and Stokes theorems relate integral and differential forms for sufficiently regular fields.[3]
Divergence describes local source balance and curl describes local circulation. At idealized interfaces with surface charge or abrupt material changes, the laws are applied to small enclosing surfaces and loops; classical pointwise derivatives require care there. Integral form is particularly useful for checking these transitions.[3]
Electric Gauss law together with Ampère–Maxwell yields charge continuity.[3]
A flux and a field value are different results
A point charge and a spherical enclosure
- Given
- A point charge lies at the centre of an imaginary sphere of radius in vacuum, with no other sources.
- Find
- Determine total electric flux and field strength on the sphere.
Approach: First obtain flux from enclosed charge, then use spherical symmetry.
Using gives the flux balance.
The field is radial everywhere on the sphere and has constant magnitude.
Result: Flux is approximately 678 V·m; the field is approximately 2.40 kV/m and points outward.
Check: Check: . Doubling the sphere radius leaves flux unchanged and reduces field magnitude to one quarter. Moving the charge off centre keeps total flux unchanged but removes constant E on the sphere.
Gauss’s law of electrostatics illustrates the same distinction between total flux and local field. Spherical symmetry supplies the additional information for the single central point charge; the Maxwell balance does not allow that geometry to be transferred to an arbitrary charge distribution.[1]
Compare spanning surfaces at a capacitor
Capacitor gap: enclosed area determines B
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Magnetic field inside and outside the plate radius
- Given
- An idealized circular vacuum capacitor has plate radius and is charging at . Plate separation is small compared with R. Geometry and excitation are modeled as rotationally symmetric; additional contributions from actual supply and return wiring are neglected. Axial E increases uniformly within the plate radius; its contribution outside is neglected in the simplified gap model. Field variation is slow compared with light travel across the relevant geometry; fringing and radiation lie outside this approximation.
- Find
- Find and B magnitude in the idealized gap plane on concentric circles of radii and .
Approach: In the gap, count enclosed displacement current; the circles are concentric with the symmetry axis.
Determine field growth from total plate current.
The inner circle encloses only the area fraction; the outer circle encloses the full current term.
Result: In the idealized gap, B grows linearly up to the plate radius and decreases inversely with radius outside it.
Check: At , both approximation formulas give . For the inner circle the total source term is only . An alternative spanning surface gives the same total current-plus-field-change term, but not necessarily the full wire current alone. If its total charge-current term on that surface is I, its oriented displacement-current contribution must here supply . Only for a loop enclosing the entire associated plate flux can a pure wire cut alone give I in the simplified model. Real fringing and asymmetric excitation limit the local B values.
Why light belongs to these field laws
In a source-free vacuum region, wave equations follow; B obeys the corresponding equation.[2]
Take the curl of Faraday’s law, insert Ampère–Maxwell and use vanishing E divergence in the source-free region to obtain a wave equation. This does not mean that every electric field is a travelling wave: static solutions, superpositions and boundary conditions also belong to the theory. A single travelling plane vacuum wave has transverse E and B fields and obeys .[2]
Field laws alone do not determine a particle trajectory. Charge motion additionally requires the Lorentz force and an equation of motion. The Poynting vector describes energy transfer. The same four laws therefore connect simple capacitors with antennas and waveguides once suitable sources and boundary conditions are supplied.[1][3]
Five exercises on balance, orientation and models
Calculate · Foundation
An enclosure contains total charge . Find net electric flux and interpret its sign.
Show hint
Use the outward normal of the closed surface.
Learning goal: Interpret the sign of net flux through a closed surface.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
Approximately −339 V·m.
Inward contributions dominate; individual surface elements need not all have negative contributions.
Rearrange · Application
A fixed circle of radius encloses a uniform +z field increasing at . Positive circulation is counterclockwise when viewed from +z. Find emf and tangential E in the rotationally symmetric model.
Show hint
First find flux change, then divide circulation by circumference.
Learning goal: Translate changing flux into oriented field circulation.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
Emf is −1.51 mV and .
Induced circulation is clockwise from +z; its negative sign refers to the specified orientation.
Interpret · Application
Magnetic net flux through an imaginary cube is zero. Does this imply inside the cube?
Show hint
Consider a constant field passing through two opposite faces.
Learning goal: Distinguish net flux from local field strength.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
No.
A uniform +z field enters the bottom and leaves the top.
Contributions −BA and +BA cancel even though the field can be nonzero everywhere.
Error analysis · Application
Consider a loop enclosing the full plate flux of an idealized charging capacitor. In the model, the wire-cut surface has , , while the gap surface has , . A calculation adds both full contributions to obtain . What is wrong?
Show hint
Which currents cross the same chosen spanning surface?
Learning goal: Detect double counting caused by switching spanning surfaces.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
The two full contributions come from different spanning surfaces.
The ideal wire cut counts I; the gap surface counts Id.
Both give for the same loop.
In general, add contributions actually present on one and the same surface.
Transfer · Challenge
Across a fixed enclosing boundary, of conventional current enters and leaves, both constant during the next . Find , the change rate of net electric flux and the change of enclosed Q over that interval.
Show hint
Outward current is positive; use continuity, then electric Gauss law.
Learning goal: Connect charge conservation to electric flux balance.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: .
Net outward current is −6 mA, so Q increases at 6 mC/s.
Net electric flux increases at approximately 6.78 · 108 V·m/s; 12 µC is added in 2 ms.
Geometry is still required for a local E value.
Example: a larger loop need not enclose more flux
Induced field outside a magnetic region
- Given
- In a rotationally symmetric quasistatic model, grows uniformly within at ; this field contribution outside is negligible. A fixed circular loop has ; positive circulation is counterclockwise from +z.
- Find
- Find emf and tangential E on the larger loop.
Approach: active flux area is the magnetic region, not the entire spanning area. Then divide by loop circumference.
Substitution: both signs refer to the specified positive orientation.
Result: Electric circulation is clockwise. Tangential field on the specified loop is −1.60 mV/m.
Check: Check: . Doubling the outer loop radius leaves enclosed flux unchanged and halves field magnitude. Inside the magnetic region, ; both expressions match at .
What additional information a field solution needs
First identify an enclosing surface or circulation loop and check whether geometry is fixed. Assign current and electric flux to the same spanning surface. Generally, . Suitable circular symmetry is needed to reduce this to ; the charge-current-only form additionally requires vanishing or negligible displacement current. A curved wire or additional currents can destroy that symmetry. Likewise, gives electric flux only when the normal component is constant across the relevant surface.[3]
In materials, polarization, magnetization and conductivity must match the field model. Fast processes can invalidate a purely quasistatic capacitor treatment or neglect of radiation. Quantum and relativistic particle effects require suitable extensions; this does not mean that classical field theory is restricted simply to small field strengths. The system under study and the accuracy of its modelling assumptions are decisive.[3]
What to take away
Distinguish enclosure from circulation and record orientation. For magnetic circulation, count current and field change on the same spanning surface. The balance does not depend on symmetry; symmetry and boundary conditions are what enable simple local field formulas.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax, University Physics Volume 2, §16.1: Maxwell’s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves
- MIT 8.02T, Chapter 13, §§13.1–13.4: displacement current and Maxwell equations
- MIT 6.013, Electromagnetics and Applications, §§1.3 and 3.3: integral laws and charging capacitor
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Added relevant scientific connections; preserved existing field and energy balances, derivations, examples, exercises, figures and model limits.
- Added an original DE/EN article with assumptions, two original worked examples and five different solved exercises.
- Revised the introduction and learning sequence, added a third model example and quantitative diagram; reviewed existing exercises, assumptions and mathematical notation.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Maxwell Equations in Integral Form. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/maxwell-integralgleichungen
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.