How much input serves the intended purpose?
A lifting drive consumes electricity, but your task initially concerns work delivered to the lifted body. Before dividing numbers, imagine a boundary around the device: what enters, what should leave, and does the device store energy during the interval? These three questions determine what an efficiency value means.[1][2]
You need energy in joules, power as energy per time, and conservation of energy. Eta denotes a ratio. Inputs and outputs in the following balance are positive energy amounts; only the storage change may be positive or negative. Heat is not automatically a loss: its usefulness depends on the chosen purpose.[1][2]
First specify useful output and system boundary
The ratio is a definition; specify what counts as useful output before calculation.[1]
A motor can receive electrical energy and deliver mechanical work. A heater instead aims to supply heat at a chosen location. The same heat can therefore be unwanted output in one application and useful output in another. Efficiencies are comparable only with compatible purpose, input, output and operating conditions. The ratio itself does not decide which output is useful.[1]
System boundary determines whether controls, power supply, bearings and auxiliary equipment are included. Shaft output divided by motor electrical input is not automatically whole-system efficiency including controls. Fuel-based efficiency also needs its heating-value convention; different reference inputs must not be silently mixed.
Conservation explains the upper bound
All inputs and outputs use the same interval; other, out includes outputs not counted as useful.[2]
If initial and final storage are equal and no input is missing, useful output is part of total input:. The rest has not disappeared but leaves through other channels. 750 J input and 600 J useful output give 80%;150 J must be accounted for. Without storage information, those 150 J are not necessarily waste heat.
A discharging store can temporarily deliver more output power than contemporaneous input. That does not mean conversion efficiency above one: stored energy decreases. During charging, some input remains inside. A complete charge-discharge cycle needs compatible endpoint storage or explicit accounting for its change.
Connect energy and power through matching averages
Both average powers use the same interval length.
For constant powers the common duration cancels in . For changing powers the ratio of their averages also works. Averaging individual instantaneous efficiencies is generally incorrect: phases receiving more input energy must count more heavily. With positive input power throughout, precisely this weighting gives interval efficiency. Idle operation also consumes energy and can lower overall efficiency.
This identity requires positive or otherwise defined input power in the instantaneous ratio.
Energy accumulates over both operating phases
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
Check percentages and rearrangements
is written 80%; use 0.80 in products.
Numerator and denominator are both energies or both compatible powers. Match joules and kilojoules; watts are not joules. 600 J useful output from 0.750 kJ input gives rather than 800. A dimensionless ratio is necessary but does not prove that accounting boundaries match. A percentage is also dimensionless.
Uncertainty in either input or output affects efficiency. A very small denominator can make the ratio especially sensitive. Instruments should cover the same interval; startup consumption, run-down and auxiliary power must not be assigned arbitrarily to another period. Meaningful comparisons state operating point and task as well as η.
Example: electrical lifting drive over a complete interval
A load gains potential energy
- Given
- The accounting boundary contains the drive, not the lifted load. The drive receives average electrical power 120 W for 180 s and delivers lifting work to a 45.0 kg load raised through 18.0 m; g=9.81 m/s2. The load has the same kinetic energy at both endpoints, so delivered lifting work is mgh. Stored energy inside the drive is unchanged in this model. The potential-energy increase of the external load is not counted again as storage inside the drive.
- Find
- Find efficiency for useful lifting work and other output.
Approach: Find input and lifting work over the same interval.
Substitute the given values with matching units.
Calculate the chosen useful output as increased potential energy.
Form efficiency and remaining accounted output.
Result: Useful lifting efficiency is 36.7875%, about 36.8%. Other outputs total 13.6539 kJ within the specified boundary.
Check: Average useful power is . Its input-power ratio also gives . The balance , in joules, closes. A different storage change would alter the other output.
Mechanical power here describes lifting work delivered to the external load per time, . This puts the already calculated useful output on the same interval length as electrical input. The load’s potential energy is still not additionally counted as storage inside the drive.[6][2]
Example: combine two operating phases correctly
A device changes operating point
- Given
- Phase A:20 s at 500 W input and 350 W useful output. Phase B:40 s at 200 W input and 80 W useful output. Constant powers within each phase, one accounting boundary and no storage change.
- Find
- Find full-cycle efficiency and compare with averaging ratios.
Approach: Find phase energies separately and then add them.
Substitute the given values with matching units.
Separately sum useful output energies.
Divide total energies.
Result: Overall efficiency 56.6667%, not 55% from the simple mean of phase efficiencies.
Check: Average powers are input and useful; . Phase efficiencies and have input-energy weights and . A time-only mean would give . Other outputs are .
Conversion chains and additional inputs
The product rule requires each defined useful output to be the next stage’s complete input.
Stages at 90% and 80% jointly give 72%, not 170% or 85%. From 1000 J initial input, stage 1 delivers 900 J to stage 2, which produces 720 J. Other outputs 100 J and 180 J sum to 280 J. Additional cooling pumps, parallel paths or stored energy may invalidate the simple product rule and require whole-system accounting.
Combined heat and power may define both heat and electrical work as useful outputs. Their energy sum can define overall energy efficiency, but does not imply equal capacity to perform work. State purpose and boundary; a large combined value does not prove large electrical efficiency.
Explore further: COP and the Carnot limit
Environmental heat QC is an additional heat-pump energy input.[3]
The model heat pump delivers of heating from of work and from the cold reservoir. Hence . This measure deliberately omits one energy input from its denominator. A heat engine instead has ; its reversible limit between constant-temperature reservoirs is , with temperatures in kelvin.[3][4]
Carnot is not a general limit for electric-motor calculations. Efficiency 80% alone specifies neither output power nor energy consumed for a task. Small and large devices with the same η may have very different consumption. Evaluate efficiency together with useful energy, duration and operating point.[5]
Carnot efficiency adds a temperature bound to the general energy ratio for an appropriate heat engine. It replaces neither complete input accounting nor the useful-output definition; this specific reservoir bound is not a general motor limit for the electrical lifting drive.[4]
Motor alone or the complete installation?
Additional inputs count when the system boundary includes them. This comparison therefore keeps motor output unchanged and changes only the accounting scope.[1][2]
Motor alone or the complete installation?
- Given
- A motor draws 800 W and delivers 640 W of shaft power. Separately supplied controls draw another 40 W. Both operate steadily for 120 s. All shaft work counts as useful output; there is no storage change. All values are supplied model inputs.
- Find
- Find motor efficiency, complete-installation efficiency, and its energy balance.
Approach: the installation receives both inputs. Compare the same useful output against two different boundaries.
Substitute powers and form energies over the common interval.
Result: The model motor has 80% efficiency; the installation including controls has approximately 76.19%. The controls change the accounting boundary, not the specified motor output.
Check: The balance closes: , in joules. Motor losses are , and the controls contribute ; together they equal the calculated of other output.
Five solved conversion balances
Calculate · Foundation
A device receives 750 J and delivers 600 J usefully with zero storage change. Find η and other output.
Show hint
Assume matching boundary and time.
Learning goal: Find useful fraction and other energy outputs.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: divide useful energy by complete input.
Thus .
With no storage change, other output is .
Check: both outputs total .
Calculate · Application
A device receives constant 200 W, delivers useful output at and runs 30 s. Find useful energy.
Show hint
First integrate power into energy.
Learning goal: Find useful energy from constant power operation.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: obtain input energy from power and duration, then multiply by efficiency.
Results are input, useful output, and useful power.
With unchanged storage, other outputs total .
Check: .
Calculate · Application
Two conversion stages have η1=0.90,η2=0.75 and initial input 2.40 kW. No auxiliary input or storage change. Find final useful power.
Show hint
The complete intermediate output becomes the next input.
Learning goal: Combine two conversion-stage efficiencies.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: all first-stage output becomes second-stage input.
Their product is .
Stage one delivers , and stage two .
Other outputs are , closing .
Interpret · Application
During 10 s a device receives 100 J electrically, supplies 130 J useful energy and outputs another 20 J. Its initial store has enough energy. Find storage change. Can 130% be claimed as conversion efficiency without qualification?
Show hint
The complete balance includes storage change.
Learning goal: Distinguish storage discharge from apparent excess efficiency.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Input minus all outputs gives storage change, here −50 J.
Storage discharge funds part of useful output.
The ratio 130 to 100 describes only this selected interval boundary, not steady conversion efficiency without storage change.
A complete boundary must explicitly include storage flow.
Error analysis · Application
A device runs first for 1 s at input 100 W and η=0.9, then for 9 s at input 10 W and η=0.5. No storage change and same useful-output definition. Someone reports 70% by averaging both efficiencies. Find correct interval efficiency.
Show hint
Weight by input energies rather than just duration or state count.
Learning goal: Average efficiency using energy weights rather than arithmetic means.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: Input energies are 100 J and 90 J, useful energies 90 J and 45 J.
Total useful output is 135 J from 190 J input, about 71.0526%.
Neither a simple mean nor duration-only weighting preserves this energy balance when input powers differ.
Other outputs total 55 J.
In brief
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax College Physics 2e §7.6: Conservation of Energy — Efficiency
- MIT Unified Engineering §2.1: First Law of Thermodynamics
- OpenStax College Physics 2e §15.5: Heat Pumps and Refrigerators
- OpenStax University Physics 2 §4.5: The Carnot Cycle
- KMK Physics MSA standards2024, printed p15: quantitative energy accounting
- OpenStax University Physics Volume 1 §7.4: Power
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Added relevant scientific connections; preserved existing field and energy balances, derivations, examples, exercises, figures and model limits.
- Clarified system boundaries and energy weighting; added an auxiliary-controls installation example and an original energy–time graph. Preserved existing examples and all five exercises; clarified solution approaches.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Efficiency of an Energy Conversion. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/wirkungsgrad
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.