Why an oscillation fades
A mass on a spring may cross its equilibrium repeatedly while its excursions become smaller. Friction removes mechanical energy. Here we use one specific friction model: the resisting force is proportional to instantaneous velocity and points opposite to it. This model gives a time function that can be checked.[1]
You need the spring force, Newton’s law, and the distinction between displacement, velocity, and acceleration. Damping first decides whether free oscillations exist at all. A damped period is meaningful only in the oscillatory regime. An externally driven oscillation follows a different equation of motion.[1]
Which equation describes a free damped oscillation?
x measures displacement from stable equilibrium. A linear restoring force −kx and viscous resistance −bẋ act on constant mass m. Assume m > 0, and b > 0, with no external drive. Resistance opposes instantaneous velocity, not necessarily x. If v is negative, resistance is positive. A constant weight can be absorbed by shifting equilibrium in a vertical linear spring arrangement. The spring–mass oscillator without friction is this model’s zero-damping limit.[1]
β has unit s−1; b has . ω0 is the undamped natural angular frequency.
When do underdamping, critical damping and overdamping occur?
After division by m, the equation is . Substitution gives . Roots determine the motion’s form. Dimensionless damping ratio compares resistance with the natural time scale.
Underdamping has an oscillatory component with a decaying envelope.[1]
Critical damping does not produce repeated sinusoidal oscillation.
Overdamping has two negative real decay rates.
No free oscillation period is defined for critical or overdamped motion. Depending on initial velocity, a single zero crossing can still occur; no oscillation does not mean no overshoot for every initial condition. At very large β the slow root approaches : more resistance can slow return. Claims about fast critical return require a specified comparison of initial conditions.
Initial conditions instead of an unsuitable phase
This applies in the underdamped regime and satisfies and .
Phase must match C and D; A0 is the initial envelope magnitude.
Using without phase fixes . That is not release from rest. With and , D is positive and phase negative. A0 can exceed x0 even though release occurs at an actual displacement maximum. This distinction prevents an envelope label being mistaken for measured initial displacement.
Release from rest inside the envelope
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
How quickly does the envelope halve and what do the peaks measure?
The last equation follows from and locates actual extrema.
The curve stays between ±A(t), but generally does not meet those bounds at displacement maxima because the envelope itself moves. Equivalent peaks on the same side are separated by Td. Since amplitude decreases, x(t + Td) differs from x(t); Td is phase recurrence time, not strict periodicity of the full motion.
xn and xn+1 are successive equivalent peaks; adjacent opposite-sign extrema are only Td/2 apart.
Over N full peak intervals use . Evaluate peaks relative to the same equilibrium. An offset near the noise floor makes ratios unstable; changing damping or Coulomb friction does not produce constant exponential decay. The logarithmic decrement expresses the ratio of equivalent peaks as a dimensionless decrease per complete phase cycle.
Energy loss without a false exponential equality
Dissipated power is bẋ2; mechanical energy cannot increase without a drive.
Exact instantaneous energy is generally not simply . Velocity and displacement contain different phase contributions because differentiating introduces an additional term. At the same phase after Td, however, both x and v scale by , so exactly. Under weak damping, a cycle-averaged exponential energy curve approximates the slow evolution.
Example: damped release from rest
Calculating the matching phase and envelope
- Given
- m = 0.800 kg, k = 20.0 N/m, , x0 = +0.0400 m, .
- Find
- Find regime, Td, the complete solution and envelope half-life.
Approach: Check the regime first, then apply both initial conditions.
First put force balance into standard form; substitute the numerical values in the next step.
Determine parameters and regime.
Insert initial values into C and D.
Determine envelope magnitude and phase.
Calculate recurrence time and half-life.
Result: The motion is underdamped. With time in seconds, the solution is .
Check: At t = 0, x = 0.0400 m and . A0 is about 2.06% greater than x0. Energy derivative is zero at release from rest, already ruling out an everywhere exact curve .
Example: parameters from equivalent peaks
Reconstructing a decay measurement
- Given
- Successive positive maxima relative to equilibrium: 15.0 mm and 9.00 mm; separation 1.20 s. Moving mass 0.600 kg. Linear viscous model.
- Find
- Find β, ωd, ω0, b and k, then predict the next peak.
Approach: The two same-side peaks are one damped period apart.
Substitute the given values with matching units.
Obtain decrement and decay rate from the ratio.
Calculate angular frequencies from peak spacing.
Use known mass to recover damping and stiffness.
Result: β ≈ 0.426 s−1, b ≈ 0.511 kg/s and k ≈ 16.6 N/m; the next positive peak is 5.40 mm.
Check: reproduces and gives . confirms underdamping. Without known mass, peak data supply only and , not b and k separately.
Free motion, driving and model limits
Explore further: driving and resonance
With an external sinusoidal force F0cos(Ωt), that force appears on the equation’s right side. After the free transient decays, the linear steady response oscillates at Ω. Thus ω0, ωd and Ω are three different quantities. Displacement-amplitude resonance additionally occurs at if ; stronger damping gives no peak at positive frequency. Other measured quantities can have different resonance conditions.[2]
Explore further: derive the resonance condition
For , minimise the squared denominator . Its derivative is . An interior amplitude maximum therefore requires ; otherwise the largest amplitude measure occurs at the static limit . This precise peak condition is derived here by differentiating the cited amplitude formula.
View equation: steady driven response
Steady displacement amplitude under harmonic forcing; not the free decay envelope.[2]
The decay model requires constant linear stiffness and resistance proportional to v. Dry friction, quadratic drag, stops and nonlinear springs can generate other envelopes and amplitude-dependent frequencies. Check sensor offset, peak spacing, support motion and possible superposed modes in measurements. An apparently exponential segment alone proves neither a single mode nor constant parameters.
Returning to equilibrium: critical or overdamped?
More damping can make overdamped return slower. This comparison uses the same spring, mass, and release from rest so that damping alone accounts for the different motion.[1]
Returning to equilibrium: critical or overdamped?
- Given
- Two free linear oscillators each have m=1.0 kg, k=4.0 N/m, x0=0.030 m, and v0=0. Only b differs: 4.0 kg/s or 5.0 kg/s. Displacement is measured from each equilibrium; neither is driven.
- Find
- Determine regimes and time functions; compare displacements after 1.0 s.
Approach: the characteristic equation and both initial conditions determine the constants.
At critical damping and give zero initial velocity. With b=5 the roots are −1 and −4 per second.
Result: For this release from rest, the critical case is closer to equilibrium after 1 s. Both motions remain positive and do not oscillate. Increasing damping here does not mean a faster return.
Check: Both satisfy and . For overdamping, , negative at positive times. The comparison applies to this release from rest; other initial velocities require their own analysis.
Five solved exercises
Calculate · Foundation
m = 0.50 kg, k = 8.0 N/m and b = 1.0 kg/s. Find regime and ωd.
Show hint
Compare β with ω0 before evaluating the square root.
Learning goal: Check damping regime before calculating frequency.
Show solution and calculation
and .
Therefore underdamped, with and .
Rearrange · Application
. How long until the envelope reaches 10%?
Show hint
Solve .
Learning goal: Find envelope decay time using logarithms.
Show solution and calculation
.
Substitution gives .
It does not require at that instant.
Rearrange · Application
and . What b threshold separates underdamping and overdamping?
Show hint
Critical damping means .
Learning goal: Find the critical damping coefficient.
Show solution and calculation
.
Below this the free component oscillates; equality is critical damping and above it is overdamping.
For , .
Interpret · Application
A free linear spring-mass model has m=1 kg, k=4 N/m, b=6 kg/s and no drive. Find β, ω0 and both characteristic roots. What does negative ωd2 imply for an attempted free-period measurement?
Show hint
Check the regime first; negative ωd2 means no real oscillation frequency here.
Learning goal: Interpret real decay rates without a free oscillation period.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: exceeds , giving overdamping.
Roots are both negative; the free solution is a sum of two exponentials.
No free oscillation period is defined.
Check: both roots satisfy . Particular initial conditions may allow one zero crossing, which does not establish periodic oscillation.
Error analysis · Application
For , , , v0=0, a proposed solution is . Check v(0) and correct the sine coefficient of the free solution.
Show hint
The exponential envelope derivative contributes to v(0) too.
Learning goal: Check initial velocity in a damped cosine solution.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: for , .
Proposed gives −0.020 m/s, not zero.
With , D must be .
Check: both initial conditions then hold. Envelope amplitude is not simply x0; initial displacement and envelope parameter are different quantities.
In brief
Check the regime before calculating a period. Both initial values determine free motion. The exponential envelope bounds displacement but is not itself the motion. Energy decay and displacement decay are different quantities; driving adds a frequency and force to the model.[1]
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics 1 §15.5: Damped Oscillations
- OpenStax University Physics 1 §15.6: Forced Oscillations
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An internal human subject review is documented for an earlier release of this page. That confirmation does not apply automatically to the revised explanation and new exercises.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Refined question headings for free motion, damping regimes and the envelope; added paragraph connections to the undamped spring–mass oscillator and logarithmic decrement.
- Explained regimes and initial values step by step; compared critical and overdamped rest releases and graphed motion with envelopes. Preserved both previous examples and all five exercises.
- Added two exercises; labelled all five by task type, difficulty and learning goal.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Damped harmonic oscillation. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/gedaempfte-harmonische-schwingung
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.