Why three voltages do not add like three lengths
An inductor and capacitor can have large individual voltages while the source supplies a much smaller voltage. Their phases differ, so the peaks do not occur together. The phasor picture therefore adds directed contributions first; impedance magnitude follows afterward.[2][1]
We study a series circuit in sinusoidal steady state. The same current flows through all three components. Positive total resistance represents losses; constant ideal L and C store energy. Check this topology before applying the formula.[2][1]
Magnitude alone does not give phase
We mark the complex phasor ratio with a tilde and call its nonnegative magnitude Z. j is the imaginary unit; R is the total effective series resistance.[2]
A series circuit carries the same current through every component, but its voltages are shifted in time. Source voltage is therefore not the sum of their positive peaks. Inductive and capacitive voltage oppose one another in the phasor picture; their difference is perpendicular to resistor voltage. Magnitude determines current size, while signed reactance also determines whether current leads or lags. Two circuits can have equal impedance magnitudes yet opposite phase relationships.[2]
Which circuit this model describes
Assume ideal linear L and C and a positive constant resistance R, all in series with a sinusoidal source at fixed angular frequency. We consider steady state after the free switching response has decayed. Component voltages use passive reference; source voltage equals the sum of voltage drops. Distributed transmission lines, frequency-dependent losses, nonlinear cores and leakage paths are not automatically represented. For example, real coil resistance belongs within R.[2][5]
The magnitude formula does not apply unchanged to a parallel circuit. There the common voltage is the starting point and complex admittances add. A square wave also contains multiple frequency components: each can be treated separately in a linear model, but a single impedance at the fundamental frequency does not describe the complete current waveform.[5]
Component laws produce the phasor triangle
Under passive reference, inductor voltage follows current change and capacitor voltage follows charge.[1]
To read the phasor, use the common current as the horizontal reference. Resistor voltage lies on the same axis. Inductor voltage leads by 90°, capacitor voltage lags by 90°. Subtracting them leaves one perpendicular reactive component. Only now apply Pythagoras, rather than adding three independent positive lengths.[2]
Choose the real part of a complex phasor rotating at positive angular frequency. Differentiation multiplies by jω; integration of the steady AC component divides by jω. This gives positive inductive and negative capacitive reactance. Kirchhoff’s loop rule adds the three complex voltages. Only after that addition do we take the magnitude. This is a consequence of component laws and the circuit model, not a new empirical law.[2][5]
φ is voltage phase minus current phase. For positive X voltage leads; for negative X current leads.[2]
Frequency, units and useful rearrangements
Hertz is not numerically equal to angular frequency in radians per second. Both ωL and the reciprocal of ωC have units of ohms; the square root contains squared ohms. Convert millihenries and microfarads into henries and farads before substitution. A measured impedance below the assumed positive series resistance contradicts this simple model: inspect measurement, component values or topology. At zero R and exact resonance an ideal finite-voltage source has no bounded steady current; the usual resonance-current ratio is invalid there.[2][5]
Two frequencies, the same circuit
Electrical power distinguishes real power from apparent power in AC. The following series example consistently uses RMS values; the series resistance R determines dissipation.[3]
Inductive operation at 45° phase angle
- Given
- , , , , source RMS voltage 60 V; ideal steady-state series circuit.
- Find
- Impedance, current, phase and average resistor power.
Approach: determine signed reactance, then magnitude, current and power.
Substitution: first evaluate the two reactances separately.
Current and phase: voltage leads current by 45°.
Result: Z ≈ 33.94 Ω; current ≈ 1.768 A; ; real power 75 W.
Check: Check: resistor voltage 42.426 V; inductor voltage 70.711 V; capacitor voltage 28.284 V. Their net reactive voltage 42.426 V and resistor voltage form a right triangle with source voltage 60 V. Also .
Halving angular frequency makes the circuit capacitive
- Given
- Same circuit with , , and RMS source voltage 60 V; now .
- Find
- New current magnitude and phase direction.
Approach: recalculate both frequency-dependent reactances; do not halve total impedance.
Substitution: inductive reactance halves, capacitive reactance doubles.
Power: larger current increases dissipation at unchanged R.
Result: Current leads voltage by about 26.57°; RMS current 2.236 A, power 120 W.
Check: Check: resistor voltage 53.666 V; net reactive voltage −26.833 V; their squared sum is 3600 V2. Since Z remains above 24 Ω, current stays below its resonance value 2.5 A.
Small total impedance can hide large component voltages
For this example current resonance occurs at about 316.23 rad/s or 50.33 Hz. RMS current is then 2.5 A and dissipation 150 W. Both L and C carry about 63.25 V RMS although the source supplies only 60 V: their opposing phasors cancel. With smaller R, voltage magnification can be much larger. Free damped oscillation frequency is a different question from the frequency of maximum steady series current. Capacitor voltage can also reach its maximum at a different frequency.[4][5]
Series current has a resonance maximum
Free with a Quanta account. Your download stays ready after registration.
The Thomson LC oscillation relation describes the natural frequency of an ideal lossless LC circuit. The same frequency marks current resonance in this ideal series RLC circuit; it does not replace a transient calculation for the damped circuit.[4]
From model to measurement
A filter must be described by the voltage actually taken as output, not Z alone. Output across R is maximal at resonance; L and C have different transfer functions. Real inductance may change at large currents, capacitors have losses and sources have internal resistance. Large resonant voltages may exceed component limits. Calculated real power describes only losses in modeled R; ideal L and C return their stored energy on average.[3][5]
Explore further: half-power bandwidth
Half power is not half current
- Given
- The same ideal series circuit has , , . The source maintains as frequency changes. Assume steady state.
- Find
- Find the two frequencies giving half maximum resistor power.
Approach: halving divides current by and multiplies Z by . Thus .
Substitution: the lower boundary is capacitive; the upper is inductive.
Result: At about 31.83 Hz and 79.58 Hz power is 75.0 W, half its resonance value of 150 W. Phases are −45° and +45°.
Check: Direct reactance calculation gives ±24 Ω at the boundaries. Bandwidth equals ; their geometric mean is resonance angular frequency, not their arithmetic mean.
Five exercises on magnitude, phase and resonance
Calculate · Application
An ideal series RLC circuit has , , at the stated frequency. Source voltage is 12 V RMS. Find Z, current and average power.
Show hint
First take the difference of reactances.
Learning goal: Compute current and dissipation from signed reactances.
Rearrange · Application
At , an ideal series circuit with and should resonate. What capacitance is required?
Show hint
Equate the two reactances.
Learning goal: Rearrange resonance condition for capacitance.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: resonance requires zero net reactance.
Rearranging for C and substituting SI values gives 125 μF.
Check: both reactances are 20 Ω and total impedance is 10 Ω.
Interpret · Foundation
Two ideal series circuits have and or −24 Ω at the same frequency. With equal source RMS voltage, which quantities agree and which phase differs?
Show hint
Squaring loses the sign; phase does not.
Learning goal: Distinguish equal impedance magnitude from equal phase.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: compare magnitude and argument separately.
Both have Z ≈ 33.94 Ω, equal RMS current and equal resistor dissipation.
In the first circuit voltage leads by 45°; in the second voltage lags current by 45°.
Check: both have the same positive power factor.
Error analysis · Application
Someone uses , , to calculate impedance as 80 Ω and current at 60 V RMS as 0.75 A. Locate and correct the error.
Show hint
Capacitive and inductive phasors oppose; R is perpendicular to them.
Learning goal: Correct scalar addition of phase-shifted voltages.
Show solution and calculation
Approach: add complex impedances, not their positive magnitudes.
Z is not .
Net reactance is 24 Ω and magnitude .
Current is about 1.768 A.
Check: the perpendicular voltage components are each 42.426 V and give a 60 V source.
Transfer · Application
An ideal series circuit has , , and a 10 V RMS source at resonance. Find current and voltages across L and C. Do their magnitudes imply free additional real power?
Show hint
At resonance , but individual reactances are not zero.
Learning goal: Reconcile resonance voltage magnification with energy conservation.
In brief
For ideal steady-state series RLC, add complex contributions first. Magnitude sets current size; reactance sets phase. At current resonance opposing reactive terms cancel in the total phasor, not in component voltages. Real power is dissipated in the modelled resistance.
Sources for this explanation
Quanta · Updated October 2, 2026
- OpenStax University Physics Vol. 2, §15.2: Simple AC Circuits
- OpenStax University Physics Vol. 2, §15.3: RLC Series Circuits with AC
- OpenStax University Physics Vol. 2, §15.4: Power in an AC Circuit
- OpenStax University Physics Vol. 2, §15.5: Resonance in an AC Circuit
- MIT 8.02, Chapter 12: Alternating-Current Circuits
Editorial responsibility: Quanta Study editorial team
Review scope
This explanation, 3 worked examples and 5 exercises are available in German and English. Structure, source references and mathematical notation undergo automated checks. Calculations, model assumptions and both language versions receive a separate AI review.
An independent, named human subject review has not yet been documented. Our exercise numbers are worked examples, rather than measurements published by the cited sources.
Editorial responsibility, sources and methodsChange history
- Linked real power and LC natural frequency in context; preserved the series model, phase, resonance limits, exercises and frequency diagram.
- Derived series-RLC phasor and signed phase; developed two original frequency examples, resonance limits and five varied exercises.
- Expanded the learning sequence and model reasoning, added a third worked example and an original quantitative diagram, and refined mathematical typography and the concluding summary.
Cite this reference page
Quanta. Impedance of a series RLC circuit. Updated October 2, 2026. https://quanta-study.de/en/formula-sheet/wechselstrom-impedanz-rlc
When citing a specific scientific statement, also cite the specialist source linked to that statement.